mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Fair Graph Representation Learning in Social Networks

arXiv 2410.11493 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2024cs.SI cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the widespread use of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for representation learning from network data, the fairness of GNN models has raised great attention lately. Fair GNNs aim to ensure that node representations can be accurately classified, but not easily associated with a specific group. Existing advanced approaches essentially enhance the generalisation of node representation in combination with data augmentation strategy, and do not directly impose constraints on the fairness of GNNs. In this work, we identify that a fundamental reason for the unfairness of GNNs in social network learning is the phenomenon of social homophily, i.e., users in the same group are more inclined to congregate. The message-passing mechanism of GNNs can cause users in the same group to have similar representations due to social homophily, leading model predictions to establish spurious correlations with sensitive attributes. Inspired by this reason, we propose a method called Equity-Aware GNN (EAGNN) towards fair graph representation learning. Specifically, to ensure that model predictions are independent of sensitive attributes while maintaining prediction performance, we introduce constraints for fair representation learning based on three principles: sufficiency, independence, and separation. We theoretically demonstrate that our EAGNN method can effectively achieve group fairness. Extensive experiments on three datasets with varying levels of social homophily illustrate that our EAGNN method achieves the state-of-the-art performance across two fairness metrics and offers competitive effectiveness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2024.

Builds on

18 of 47 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  3. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  4. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  6. 2022GraphMAE: Self-Supervised Masked Graph Autoencoderscited by 448
  7. 2021SUGAR: Subgraph Neural Network with Reinforcement Pooling and Self-Supervised Mutual Information Mechanismcited by 75
  8. 2024Can GNN be Good Adapter for LLMs?cited by 71
  9. 2022Improving Fairness in Graph Neural Networks via Mitigating Sensitive Attribute Leakagecited by 61
  10. 2022Adversarial Graph Contrastive Learning with Information Regularizationcited by 38
  11. 2021Unbiased Graph Embedding with Biased Graph Observationscited by 28
  12. 2023Hyperbolic Geometric Graph Representation Learning for Hierarchy-imbalance Node Classificationcited by 23
6 more
  1. 2023Towards Fair Graph Neural Networks via Graph Counterfactualcited by 23
  2. 2023GraphSHA: Synthesizing Harder Samples for Class-Imbalanced Node Classificationcited by 17
  3. 2024Rethinking Fair Graph Neural Networks from Re-balancingcited by 11
  4. 2024Fairness Rising from the Ranks: HITS and PageRank on Homophilic Networkscited by 6
  5. 2023Rumor Detection with Diverse Counterfactual Evidencecited by 4
  6. 2023Fair Supervised Learning with A Simple Random Sampler of Sensitive Attributescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.