mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SLIP: Securing LLMs IP Using Weights Decomposition

arXiv 2407.10886 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2024cs.CR cs.LG stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have recently seen widespread adoption in both academia and industry. As these models grow, they become valuable intellectual property (IP), reflecting substantial investments by their owners. The high cost of cloud-based deployment has spurred interest in running models on edge devices, but this risks exposing parameters to theft and unauthorized use. Existing approaches to protect model IP on the edge trade off practicality, accuracy, or deployment requirements. We introduce SLIP, a hybrid inference algorithm designed to protect edge-deployed models from theft. SLIP is, to our knowledge, the first hybrid protocol that is both practical for real-world applications and provably secure, while incurring zero accuracy degradation and minimal latency overhead. It partitions the model across two computing resources: one secure but expensive, and one cost-effective but vulnerable. Using matrix decomposition, the secure resource retains the most sensitive portion of the model's IP while performing only a small fraction of the computation; the vulnerable resource executes the remainder. The protocol includes security guarantees that prevent attackers from using the partition to infer the protected information. Finally, we present experimental results that demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of our method, positioning it as a compelling solution for protecting LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2024.

Builds on

45 of 86 references.

References · 45

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  5. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  6. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  7. 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 643
  8. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
  9. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 380
  10. 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 334
  11. 2024PiSSA: Principal Singular Values and Singular Vectors Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 261
  12. 2024SVD-LLM: Truncation-aware Singular Value Decomposition for Large Language Model Compressioncited by 231
33 more
  1. 2017Embedding Watermarks into Deep Neural Networkscited by 227
  2. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 208
  3. 2018Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inferencecited by 193
  4. 2017A Survey on Homomorphic Encryption Schemes: Theory and Implementationcited by 154
  5. 2024Stealing Part of a Production Language Modelcited by 152
  6. 2021CrypTen: Secure Multi-Party Computation Meets Machine Learningcited by 131
  7. 2020Data-Free Model Extractioncited by 121
  8. 2023The Truth is in There: Improving Reasoning in Language Models with Layer-Selective Rank Reductioncited by 120
  9. 2020MAZE: Data-Free Model Stealing Attack Using Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimationcited by 99
  10. 2019[Extended version] Rethinking Deep Neural Network Ownership Verification: Embedding Passports to Defeat Ambiguity Attackscited by 82
  11. 2020CrypTFlow2: Practical 2-Party Secure Inferencecited by 82
  12. 2022I Know What You Trained Last Summer: A Survey on Stealing Machine Learning Models and Defencescited by 75
  13. 2021A survey of deep neural network watermarking techniquescited by 69
  14. 2021Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning with Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Deep Neural Networkcited by 57
  15. 2017DeepSecure: Scalable Provably-Secure Deep Learningcited by 48
  16. 2020Mind Your Weight(s): A Large-scale Study on Insufficient Machine Learning Model Protection in Mobile Appscited by 35
  17. 2019Secure Evaluation of Quantized Neural Networkscited by 22
  18. 2023Model Leeching: An Extraction Attack Targeting LLMscited by 22
  19. 2024Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024cited by 22
  20. 2023Rethinking White-Box Watermarks on Deep Learning Models under Neural Structural Obfuscationcited by 20
  21. 2023Converting Transformers to Polynomial Form for Secure Inference Over Homomorphic Encryptioncited by 19
  22. 2023Polynomial Time Cryptanalytic Extraction of Neural Network Modelscited by 17
  23. 2023NNSplitter: An Active Defense Solution for DNN Model via Automated Weight Obfuscationcited by 15
  24. 2018TAPAS: Tricks to Accelerate (encrypted) Prediction As a Servicecited by 14
  25. 2020Training DNN Model with Secret Key for Model Protectioncited by 14
  26. 2020Highly Accurate CNN Inference Using Approximate Activation Functions over Homomorphic Encryptioncited by 13
  27. 2020Indistinguishability Obfuscation from Well-Founded Assumptionscited by 12
  28. 2021AdvParams: An Active DNN Intellectual Property Protection Technique via Adversarial Perturbation Based Parameter Encryptioncited by 11
  29. 2024TransLinkGuard: Safeguarding Transformer Models Against Model Stealing in Edge Deploymentcited by 11
  30. 2024Crayon: Customized On-Device LLM via Instant Adapter Blending and Edge-Server Hybrid Inferencecited by 7
  31. 2018DeepObfuscation: Securing the Structure of Convolutional Neural Networks via Knowledge Distillationcited by 6
  32. 2021Fully Homomorphically Encrypted Deep Learning as a Servicecited by 6
  33. 2022ObfuNAS: A Neural Architecture Search-based DNN Obfuscation Approachcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 9; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: