ImF: Implicit Fingerprint for Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training large language models (LLMs) is resource-intensive and expensive, making protecting intellectual property (IP) for LLMs crucial. Recently, embedding fingerprints into LLMs has emerged as a prevalent method for establishing model ownership. However, existing fingerprinting techniques typically embed identifiable patterns with weak semantic coherence, resulting in fingerprints that significantly differ from the natural question-answering (QA) behavior inherent to LLMs. This discrepancy undermines the stealthiness of the embedded fingerprints and makes them vulnerable to adversarial attacks. In this paper, we first demonstrate the critical vulnerability of existing fingerprint embedding methods by introducing a novel adversarial attack named Generation Revision Intervention (GRI) attack. GRI attack exploits the semantic fragility of current fingerprinting methods, effectively erasing fingerprints by disrupting their weakly correlated semantic structures. Our empirical evaluation highlights that traditional fingerprinting approaches are significantly compromised by the GRI attack, revealing severe limitations in their robustness under realistic adversarial conditions. To advance the state-of-the-art in model fingerprinting, we propose a novel model fingerprint paradigm called Implicit Fingerprints (ImF). ImF leverages steganography techniques to subtly embed ownership information within natural texts, subsequently using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to construct semantically coherent and contextually natural QA pairs. This design ensures that fingerprints seamlessly integrate with the standard model behavior, remaining indistinguishable from regular outputs and substantially reducing the risk of accidental triggering and targeted removal. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of ImF on 15 diverse LLMs, spanning different architectures and varying scales.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2025.
Builds on
21 of 41 references.
References · 21
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
- 2023AudioPaLM: A Large Language Model That Can Speak and Listencited by 343
- 2023Text-to-Audio Generation using Instruction-Tuned LLM and Latent Diffusion Modelcited by 145
- 2023LLM360: Towards Fully Transparent Open-Source LLMscited by 104
- 2019Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 78
- 2024Instructional Fingerprinting of Large Language Modelscited by 68
- 2022Watermarking Pre-trained Language Models with Backdooringcited by 50
9 more
- 2024Vitron: A Unified Pixel-level Vision LLM for Understanding, Generating, Segmenting, Editingcited by 49
- 2022SSLGuard: A Watermarking Scheme for Self-supervised Learning Pre-trained Encoderscited by 45
- 2024Hey, That's My Model! Introducing Chain & Hash, An LLM Fingerprinting Techniquecited by 37
- 2021Provably Secure Generative Linguistic Steganographycited by 34
- 2024A Survey on the Honesty of Large Language Modelscited by 23
- 2023False Claims against Model Ownership Resolutioncited by 17
- 2024MEA-Defender: A Robust Watermark against Model Extraction Attackcited by 17
- 2024Generative Text Steganography with Large Language Modelcited by 17
- 2024SLIP: Securing LLMs IP Using Weights Decompositioncited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2025A Survey of LLM-Driven AI Agent Communication: Protocols, Security Risks, and Defense Countermeasurescited by 57
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2025Copyright Protection for Large Language Models: A Survey of Methods, Challenges, and Trendscited by 20
- 2025Are Robust LLM Fingerprints Adversarially Robust?cited by 8
- 2025Attacks and Defenses Against LLM Fingerprintingcited by 1
- 2026DNF: Dual-Layer Nested Fingerprinting for Large Language Model Intellectual Property Protectioncited by 0
- 2026Language Model Fingerprinting Requires Rethinking Watermark Teacherscited by 0
- 2026Language Model Fingerprinting Requires Rethinking Watermark Teachers3 Oct 2026
- 2026DNF: Dual-Layer Nested Fingerprinting for Large Language Model Intellectual Property Protection13 Jan 2026
- 2025Are Robust LLM Fingerprints Adversarially Robust?30 Sep 2025
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models4 Sep 2025
- 2025Copyright Protection for Large Language Models: A Survey of Methods, Challenges, and Trends15 Aug 2025
- 2025Attacks and Defenses Against LLM Fingerprinting12 Aug 2025
- 2025A Survey of LLM-Driven AI Agent Communication: Protocols, Security Risks, and Defense Countermeasures24 Jun 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025CTCC: A Robust and Stealthy Fingerprinting Framework for Large Language Models via Cross-Turn Contextual Correlation Backdoor
- 2026SIF: Semantically In-Distribution Fingerprints for Large Vision-Language Models
- 2025FPEdit: Robust LLM Fingerprinting through Localized Parameter Editing
- 2026A Behavioral Fingerprint for Large Language Models: Provenance Tracking via Refusal Vectors
- 2023HuRef: HUman-REadable Fingerprint for Large Language Models
- 2026Inhibitory Attacks on Backdoor-based Fingerprinting for Large Language Models
- 2025SELF: A Robust Singular Value and Eigenvalue Approach for LLM Fingerprinting
- 2026From Bits to Beliefs: Recoverable Semantic Fingerprints for Black-Box Verification of Large Language Models