mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ConvNLP: Image-based AI Text Detection

arXiv 2407.07225 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The potentials of Generative-AI technologies like Large Language models (LLMs) to revolutionize education are undermined by ethical considerations around their misuse which worsens the problem of academic dishonesty. LLMs like GPT-4 and Llama 2 are becoming increasingly powerful in generating sophisticated content and answering questions, from writing academic essays to solving complex math problems. Students are relying on these LLMs to complete their assignments and thus compromising academic integrity. Solutions to detect LLM-generated text are compute-intensive and often lack generalization. This paper presents a novel approach for detecting LLM-generated AI-text using a visual representation of word embedding. We have formulated a novel Convolutional Neural Network called ZigZag ResNet, as well as a scheduler for improving generalization, named ZigZag Scheduler. Through extensive evaluation using datasets of text generated by six different state-of-the-art LLMs, our model demonstrates strong intra-domain and inter-domain generalization capabilities. Our best model detects AI-generated text with an impressive average detection rate (over inter- and intra-domain test data) of 88.35%. Through an exhaustive ablation study, our ZigZag ResNet and ZigZag Scheduler provide a performance improvement of nearly 4% over the vanilla ResNet. The end-to-end inference latency of our model is below 2.5ms per sentence. Our solution offers a lightweight, computationally efficient, and faster alternative to existing tools for AI-generated text detection, with better generalization performance. It can help academic institutions in their fight against the misuse of LLMs in academic settings. Through this work, we aim to contribute to safeguarding the principles of academic integrity and ensuring the trustworthiness of student work in the era of advanced LLMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2024.

Builds on

29 of 45 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  7. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  8. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  9. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 676
  10. 2018Universal Sentence Encodercited by 485
  11. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  12. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
17 more
  1. 2017"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detectioncited by 361
  2. 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 224
  3. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
  4. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 175
  5. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 170
  6. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
  7. 2019Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Textcited by 98
  8. 2022Programming Is Hard -- Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities And Challenges of AI Code Generationcited by 97
  9. 2023Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Textcited by 86
  10. 2023Watermarking Text Generated by Black-Box Language Modelscited by 68
  11. 2023Large Language Models in Education: Vision and Opportunitiescited by 54
  12. 2023Large Language Models can be Guided to Evade AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
  13. 2023Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detectioncited by 41
  14. 2022Machine Learning Model Sizes and the Parameter Gapcited by 39
  15. 2024Decoding the AI Pen: Techniques and Challenges in Detecting AI-Generated Textcited by 14
  16. 2023Beyond Black Box AI-Generated Plagiarism Detection: From Sentence to Document Levelcited by 10
  17. 2017From Image to Text Classification: A Novel Approach based on Clustering Word Embeddingscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.