mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Beyond Black Box AI-Generated Plagiarism Detection: From Sentence to Document Level

arXiv 2306.08122 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing reliance on large language models (LLMs) in academic writing has led to a rise in plagiarism. Existing AI-generated text classifiers have limited accuracy and often produce false positives. We propose a novel approach using natural language processing (NLP) techniques, offering quantifiable metrics at both sentence and document levels for easier interpretation by human evaluators. Our method employs a multi-faceted approach, generating multiple paraphrased versions of a given question and inputting them into the LLM to generate answers. By using a contrastive loss function based on cosine similarity, we match generated sentences with those from the student's response. Our approach achieves up to 94% accuracy in classifying human and AI text, providing a robust and adaptable solution for plagiarism detection in academic settings. This method improves with LLM advancements, reducing the need for new model training or reconfiguration, and offers a more transparent way of evaluating and detecting AI-generated text.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2023.

Builds on

12 of 28 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,278
  2. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,581
  3. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 717
  4. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 511
  5. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 478
  6. 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 411
  7. 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 128
  8. 2017A Tutorial on Kernel Density Estimation and Recent Advancescited by 101
  9. 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 91
  10. 2023Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detectioncited by 41
  11. 2023ChatGPT in the Classroom: An Analysis of Its Strengths and Weaknesses for Solving Undergraduate Computer Science Questionscited by 13
  12. 2023AI, write an essay for me: A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essayscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

10 papers.