mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stepping on the Edge: Curvature Aware Learning Rate Tuners

arXiv 2407.06183 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2024cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Curvature information -- particularly, the largest eigenvalue of the loss Hessian, known as the sharpness -- often forms the basis for learning rate tuners. However, recent work has shown that the curvature information undergoes complex dynamics during training, going from a phase of increasing sharpness to eventual stabilization. We analyze the closed-loop feedback effect between learning rate tuning and curvature. We find that classical learning rate tuners may yield greater one-step loss reduction, yet they ultimately underperform in the long term when compared to constant learning rates in the full batch regime. These models break the stabilization of the sharpness, which we explain using a simplified model of the joint dynamics of the learning rate and the curvature. To further investigate these effects, we introduce a new learning rate tuning method, Curvature Dynamics Aware Tuning (CDAT), which prioritizes long term curvature stabilization over instantaneous progress on the objective. In the full batch regime, CDAT shows behavior akin to prefixed warm-up schedules on deep learning objectives, outperforming tuned constant learning rates. In the mini batch regime, we observe that stochasticity introduces confounding effects that explain the previous success of some learning rate tuners at appropriate batch sizes. Our findings highlight the critical role of understanding the joint dynamics of the learning rate and curvature, beyond greedy minimization, to diagnose failures and design effective adaptive learning rate tuners.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2024.

Builds on

41 of 66 references.

References · 41

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  5. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  6. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  7. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
  8. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  9. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 776
  10. 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 763
  11. 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 413
  12. 2019An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Densitycited by 289
29 more
  1. 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 270
  2. 2023Sophia: A Scalable Stochastic Second-order Optimizer for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 260
  3. 2020The large learning rate phase of deep learning: the catapult mechanismcited by 206
  4. 2023Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilitiescited by 182
  5. 2022Self-Stabilization: The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 151
  6. 2020The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural Networkscited by 149
  7. 2020Stochastic Polyak Step-size for SGD: An Adaptive Learning Rate for Fast Convergencecited by 137
  8. 2023Prodigy: An Expeditiously Adaptive Parameter-Free Learnercited by 129
  9. 2022Understanding Gradient Descent on Edge of Stability in Deep Learningcited by 126
  10. 2019Painless Stochastic Gradient: Interpolation, Line-Search, and Convergence Ratescited by 119
  11. 2017Online Learning Rate Adaptation with Hypergradient Descentcited by 117
  12. 2023Learning-Rate-Free Learning by D-Adaptationcited by 113
  13. 2022Adaptive Gradient Methods at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 88
  14. 2018On the Relation Between the Sharpest Directions of DNN Loss and the SGD Step Lengthcited by 85
  15. 2023DoG is SGD's Best Friend: A Parameter-Free Dynamic Step Size Schedulecited by 85
  16. 2021SCENIC: A JAX Library for Computer Vision Research and Beyondcited by 56
  17. 2019Training Neural Networks for and by Interpolationcited by 45
  18. 2023The Implicit Regularization of Dynamical Stability in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 44
  19. 2024The Elements of Differentiable Programmingcited by 41
  20. 2022Second-order regression models exhibit progressive sharpening to the edge of stabilitycited by 40
  21. 2021A Loss Curvature Perspective on Training Instability in Deep Learningcited by 39
  22. 2020On Learning Rates and Schr"odinger Operatorscited by 33
  23. 2023Universal Sharpness Dynamics in Neural Network Training: Fixed Point Analysis, Edge of Stability, and Route to Chaoscited by 21
  24. 2023Mechanic: A Learning Rate Tunercited by 20
  25. 2023Don't be so Monotone: Relaxing Stochastic Line Search in Over-Parameterized Modelscited by 15
  26. 2024High dimensional analysis reveals conservative sharpening and a stochastic edge of stabilitycited by 15
  27. 2019Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNscited by 14
  28. 2023On a continuous time model of gradient descent dynamics and instability in deep learningcited by 11
  29. 2023On the Interplay Between Stepsize Tuning and Progressive Sharpeningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

8 papers.