Feature Evolution and Migration during Vision Transformer Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a novel view on feature evolution in Vision Transformers (ViTs) by visualizing the training process over two dimensions -- network depth (layer) and training time (epochs). We employ Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to extract candidate sparse features from CLS-token representations and compare their activation profiles across epoch--layer pairs. This allows us to study feature-level dynamics that are not directly visible from representation-level similarity measures. Furthermore, we demonstrate how this framework of feature evolution allows us to describe feature migration, the change in the layer where a feature is most detectable during training. Our experiments show that migration is concentrated early in training, occurs more often toward earlier layers than toward deeper layers, and declines as feature organization stabilizes. We further find that deeper layers stabilize earlier and more strongly than shallow layers. The results show that our approach can be employed as a tool for understanding how ViTs learn and evolve.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.
Builds on
36 of 66 references.
References · 36
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
24 more
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 413
- 2014Qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problemscited by 186
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 118
- 2021Transformer visualization via dictionary learning: contextualized embedding as a linear superposition of transformer factorscited by 106
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysiscited by 80
- 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 66
- 2022A Closer Look at Self-Supervised Lightweight Vision Transformerscited by 31
- 2024Enhancing Neural Network Interpretability with Feature-Aligned Sparse Autoencoderscited by 25
- 2025Position: Use Sparse Autoencoders to Discover Unknownscited by 17
- 2024Understanding Visual Feature Reliance through the Lens of Complexitycited by 15
- 2024Tracking the Feature Dynamics in LLM Training: A Mechanistic Studycited by 15
- 2024Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Targeted Concept Erasure Taskscited by 14
- 2024Beyond Scalars: Concept-Based Alignment Analysis in Vision Transformerscited by 11
- 2025Representational Similarity via Interpretable Visual Conceptscited by 5
- 2025DB-KSVD: Scalable Alternating Optimization for Disentangling High-Dimensional Embedding Spacescited by 2
- 2024Interpreting the structure of multi-object representations in vision encoderscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.