Narrowing the Gap between Adversarial and Stochastic MDPs via Policy Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of learning in adversarial Markov decision processes [MDPs] with an oblivious adversary in a full-information setting. The agent interacts with an environment during T episodes, each of which consists of H stages, and each episode is evaluated with respect to a reward function that will be revealed only at the end of the episode. We propose an algorithm, called APO-MVP, that achieves a regret bound of order tildeO(poly(H)√SAT), where S and A are sizes of the state and action spaces, respectively. This result improves upon the best-known regret bound by a factor of √S, bridging the gap between adversarial and stochastic MDPs, and matching the minimax lower bound Omega(√H3SAT) as far as the dependencies in S,A,T are concerned. The proposed algorithm and analysis completely avoid the typical tool given by occupancy measures; instead, it performs policy optimization based only on dynamic programming and on a black-box online linear optimization strategy run over estimated advantage functions, making it easy to implement. The analysis leverages two recent techniques: policy optimization based on online linear optimization strategies (Jonckheere et al., 2023) and a refined martingale analysis of the impact on values of estimating transitions kernels (Zhang et al., 2023).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2024.
Builds on
28 of 51 references.
References · 28
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
- 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
- 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
- 2019Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy Optimizationcited by 203
- 2017Unifying PAC and Regret: Uniform PAC Bounds for Episodic Reinforcement Learningcited by 175
- 2020Episodic Reinforcement Learning in Finite MDPs: Minimax Lower Bounds Revisitedcited by 104
- 2020Is Reinforcement Learning More Difficult Than Bandits? A Near-optimal Algorithm Escaping the Curse of Horizoncited by 99
- 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 91
- 2019Learning Adversarial MDPs with Bandit Feedback and Unknown Transitioncited by 84
- 2019Online Convex Optimization in Adversarial Markov Decision Processescited by 79
16 more
- 2020Optimistic Policy Optimization with Bandit Feedbackcited by 79
- 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 68
- 2019Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Exploration via Randomized Value Functionscited by 57
- 2021Cautiously Optimistic Policy Optimization and Exploration with Linear Function Approximationcited by 53
- 2021Policy Optimization in Adversarial MDPs: Improved Exploration via Dilated Bonusescited by 51
- 2023Settling the Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
- 2021The best of both worlds: stochastic and adversarial episodic MDPs with unknown transitioncited by 40
- 2020Learning Adversarial Markov Decision Processes with Delayed Feedbackcited by 33
- 2015Scale-Free Algorithms for Online Linear Optimizationcited by 30
- 2021Near-optimal Policy Optimization Algorithms for Learning Adversarial Linear Mixture MDPscited by 28
- 2023A Theoretical Analysis of Optimistic Proximal Policy Optimization in Linear Markov Decision Processescited by 28
- 2018KL-UCB-switch: optimal regret bounds for stochastic bandits from both a distribution-dependent and a distribution-free viewpointscited by 20
- 2023Rate-Optimal Policy Optimization for Linear Markov Decision Processescited by 14
- 2023Towards Optimal Regret in Adversarial Linear MDPs with Bandit Feedbackcited by 12
- 2024Warm-up Free Policy Optimization: Improved Regret in Linear Markov Decision Processescited by 5
- 2023Policy Optimization via Adv2: Adversarial Learning on Advantage Functionscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.