Mitigating Low-Frequency Bias: Feature Recalibration and Frequency Attention Regularization for Adversarial Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring the robustness of deep neural networks against adversarial attacks remains a fundamental challenge in computer vision. While adversarial training (AT) has emerged as a promising defense strategy, our analysis reveals a critical limitation: AT-trained models exhibit a bias toward low-frequency features while neglecting high-frequency components. This bias is particularly concerning as each frequency component carries distinct and crucial information: low-frequency features encode fundamental structural patterns, while high-frequency features capture intricate details and textures. To address this limitation, we propose High-Frequency Feature Disentanglement and Recalibration (HFDR), a novel module that strategically separates and recalibrates frequency-specific features to capture latent semantic cues. We further introduce frequency attention regularization to harmonize feature extraction across the frequency spectrum and mitigate the inherent low-frequency bias of AT. Extensive experiments demonstrate our method's superior performance against white-box attacks and transfer attacks, while exhibiting strong generalization capabilities across diverse scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2024.
Builds on
54 of 69 references.
References · 54
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
38 more
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
- 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 283
- 2021Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Featurescited by 261
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
- 2019Texture Fields: Learning Texture Representations in Function Spacecited by 210
- 2022Self-supervised Learning of Adversarial Example: Towards Good Generalizations for Deepfake Detectioncited by 172
- 2022Frequency Domain Model Augmentation for Adversarial Attackcited by 128
- 2018Feature Distillation: DNN-Oriented JPEG Compression Against Adversarial Examplescited by 98
- 2022LAS-AT: Adversarial Training with Learnable Attack Strategycited by 94
- 2020Learnable Boundary Guided Adversarial Trainingcited by 93
- 2021Adversarial Sticker: A Stealthy Attack Method in the Physical Worldcited by 92
- 2019When NAS Meets Robustness: In Search of Robust Architectures against Adversarial Attackscited by 87
- 2018Universal Adversarial Trainingcited by 85
- 2023Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat Modelscited by 79
- 2022Frequency-driven Imperceptible Adversarial Attack on Semantic Similaritycited by 76
- 2022Improving Vision Transformers by Revisiting High-frequency Componentscited by 75
- 2022When Adversarial Training Meets Vision Transformers: Recipes from Training to Architecturecited by 64
- 2023CFA: Class-wise Calibrated Fair Adversarial Trainingcited by 53
- 2022Improving the Transferability of Targeted Adversarial Examples through Object-Based Diverse Inputcited by 49
- 2022Practical Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness via Adaptive Auto Attackcited by 44
- 2021Consistency Regularization for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 42
- 2022Adv-Attribute: Inconspicuous and Transferable Adversarial Attack on Face Recognitioncited by 42
- 2017Adversarial Image Perturbation for Privacy Protection -- A Game Theory Perspectivecited by 38
- 2022Don't Lie to Me! Robust and Efficient Explainability with Verified Perturbation Analysiscited by 38
- 2023Randomized Adversarial Training via Taylor Expansioncited by 28
- 2022Temporal Lift Pooling for Continuous Sign Language Recognitioncited by 26
- 2022Fourier Document Restoration for Robust Document Dewarping and Recognitioncited by 21
- 2020Making Adversarial Examples More Transferable and Indistinguishablecited by 19
- 2023Feature Separation and Recalibration for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 16
- 2023Towards Building More Robust Models with Frequency Biascited by 12
- 2023HybridAugment++: Unified Frequency Spectra Perturbations for Model Robustnesscited by 12
- 2020Enhancing Intrinsic Adversarial Robustness via Feature Pyramid Decodercited by 10
- 2023Information-containing Adversarial Perturbation for Combating Facial Manipulation Systemscited by 9
50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.