mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Knowledge Composition using Task Vectors with Learned Anisotropic Scaling

arXiv 2407.02880 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 37

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained models produce strong generic representations that can be adapted via fine-tuning. The learned weight difference relative to the pre-trained model, known as a task vector, characterises the direction and stride of fine-tuning. The significance of task vectors is such that simple arithmetic operations on them can be used to combine diverse representations from different domains. This paper builds on these properties of task vectors and aims to answer (1) whether components of task vectors, particularly parameter blocks, exhibit similar characteristics, and (2) how such blocks can be used to enhance knowledge composition and transfer. To this end, we introduce aTLAS, an algorithm that linearly combines parameter blocks with different learned coefficients, resulting in anisotropic scaling at the task vector level. We show that such linear combinations explicitly exploit the low intrinsic dimensionality of pre-trained models, with only a few coefficients being the learnable parameters. Furthermore, composition of parameter blocks leverages the already learned representations, thereby reducing the dependency on large amounts of data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in task arithmetic, few-shot recognition and test-time adaptation, with supervised or unsupervised objectives. In particular, we show that (1) learned anisotropic scaling allows task vectors to be more disentangled, causing less interference in composition; (2) task vector composition excels with scarce or no labeled data and is less prone to domain shift, thus leading to better generalisability; (3) mixing the most informative parameter blocks across different task vectors prior to training can reduce the memory footprint and improve the flexibility of knowledge transfer. Moreover, we show the potential of aTLAS as a PEFT method, particularly with less data, and demonstrate its scalibility.

Key facts. Cited by 37 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2024.

Builds on

48 of 71 references.

References · 48

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  6. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  7. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  8. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  9. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  10. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  11. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  12. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
36 more
  1. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  2. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  3. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  4. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  5. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  6. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  7. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  8. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  9. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  10. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  11. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  12. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  13. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  14. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
  15. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,021
  16. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  17. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  18. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 795
  19. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 791
  20. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
  21. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 507
  22. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  23. 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 364
  24. 2023LoraHub: Efficient Cross-Task Generalization via Dynamic LoRA Compositioncited by 359
  25. 2022Tip-Adapter: Training-free Adaption of CLIP for Few-shot Classificationcited by 355
  26. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
  27. 2023AdaMerging: Adaptive Model Merging for Multi-Task Learningcited by 248
  28. 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 218
  29. 2022Patching open-vocabulary models by interpolating weightscited by 187
  30. 2022ZegCLIP: Towards Adapting CLIP for Zero-shot Semantic Segmentationcited by 178
  31. 2020Spatially Conditioned Graphs for Detecting Human-Object Interactionscited by 93
  32. 2021Efficient Two-Stage Detection of Human-Object Interactions with a Novel Unary-Pairwise Transformercited by 91
  33. 2024LP++: A Surprisingly Strong Linear Probe for Few-Shot CLIPcited by 60
  34. 2023Exploring Predicate Visual Context in Detecting Human-Object Interactionscited by 56
  35. 2023S-CLIP: Semi-supervised Vision-Language Learning using Few Specialist Captionscited by 29
  36. 2024Does Combining Parameter-efficient Modules Improve Few-shot Transfer Accuracy?cited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 22; 2026: 13.

37 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunitiescited by 247
  2. 2024LiNeS: Post-training Layer Scaling Prevents Forgetting and Enhances Model Mergingcited by 39
  3. 2025Modeling Multi-Task Model Merging as Adaptive Projective Gradient Descentcited by 39
  4. 2025RandLoRA: Full-rank parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large modelscited by 34
  5. 2025Update Your Transformer to the Latest Release: Re-Basin of Task Vectorscited by 17
  6. 2025Towards Higher Effective Rank in Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning using Khatri--Rao Productcited by 10
  7. 2025Model Merging Scaling Laws in Large Language Modelscited by 10
  8. 2025Scalable Model Merging with Progressive Layer-wise Distillationcited by 9
  9. 2025Dynamic Task Vector Grouping for Efficient Multi-Task Prompt Tuningcited by 6
  10. 2025Adaptive Helpfulness-Harmlessness Alignment with Preference Vectorscited by 6
  11. 2026Model Merging in the Essential Subspacecited by 6
  12. 2025A Systematic Study of In-the-Wild Model Merging for Large Language Modelscited by 4
25 more
  1. 2025BADTV: Unveiling Backdoor Threats in Third-Party Task Vectorscited by 3
  2. 2025On Fairness of Task Arithmetic: The Role of Task Vectorscited by 3
  3. 2025Can MLLMs Absorb Math Reasoning Abilities from LLMs as Free Lunch?cited by 2
  4. 2026Per-parameter Task Arithmetic for Unlearning in Large Language Modelscited by 2
  5. 2026Bus-Conditioned Zero-Shot Trajectory Generation via Task Arithmeticcited by 2
  6. 2026Alignment Dynamics in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 2
  7. 2025Task Vector Bases: A Unified and Scalable Framework for Compressed Task Arithmeticcited by 1
  8. 2025Single-Input Multi-Output Model Merging: Leveraging Foundation Models for Dense Multi-Task Learningcited by 1
  9. 2025Cross-Model Transfer of Task Vectors via Few-Shot Orthogonal Alignmentcited by 1
  10. 2025Decomposing Task Vectors for Refined Model Editingcited by 1
  11. 2026AR-MAP: Are Autoregressive Large Language Models Implicit Teachers for Diffusion Large Language Models?cited by 1
  12. 2026When the Model Said 'No Comment', We Knew Helpfulness Was Dead, Honesty Was Alive, and Safety Was Terrifiedcited by 1
  13. 2026Essential Subspace Merging for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1
  14. 2025SineLoRADelta: Sine-Activated Delta Compressioncited by 0
  15. 2025Advancing AI-assisted Hardware Design with Hierarchical Decentralized Training and Personalized Inference-Time Optimizationcited by 0
  16. 2025Efficient Multi-Source Knowledge Transfer by Model Mergingcited by 0
  17. 2025Variational Task Vector Compositioncited by 0
  18. 2025Escaping Optimization Stagnation: Taking Steps Beyond Task Arithmetic via Difference Vectorscited by 0
  19. 2025Basis-Oriented Low-rank Transfer for Few-Shot and Test-Time Adaptationcited by 0
  20. 2026MergeRec: Model Merging for Data-Isolated Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendationcited by 0
  21. 2026Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation in Remote Sensing via Hierarchical Attention Masking and Model Compositioncited by 0
  22. 2026ReForge: Refining Merged Models with Anchor-Regularized Regressioncited by 0
  23. 2026Distributional Alignment as a Criterion for Designing Task Vectors in In-Context Learningcited by 0
  24. 2026Saliency-Aware Model Mergingcited by 0
  25. 2026CABS+: Efficient and Scalable Model Merging via Conflict-Aware Sparsification and Adaptive Weight Allocationcited by 0