mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Single-Input Multi-Output Model Merging: Leveraging Foundation Models for Dense Multi-Task Learning

arXiv 2504.11268 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model merging is a flexible and computationally tractable approach to merge single-task checkpoints into a multi-task model. Prior work has solely focused on constrained multi-task settings where there is a one-to-one mapping between a sample and a task, overlooking the paradigm where multiple tasks may operate on the same sample, e.g., scene understanding. In this paper, we focus on the multi-task setting with single-input-multiple-outputs (SIMO) and show that it qualitatively differs from the single-input-single-output model merging settings studied in the literature due to the existence of task-specific decoders and diverse loss objectives. We identify that existing model merging methods lead to significant performance degradation, primarily due to representation misalignment between the merged encoder and task-specific decoders. We propose two simple and efficient fixes for the SIMO setting to re-align the feature representation after merging. Compared to joint fine-tuning, our approach is computationally effective and flexible, and sheds light into identifying task relationships in an offline manner. Experiments on NYUv2, Cityscapes, and a subset of the Taskonomy dataset demonstrate: (1) task arithmetic suffices to enable multi-task capabilities; however, the representations generated by the merged encoder has to be re-aligned with the task-specific heads; (2) the proposed architecture rivals traditional multi-task learning in performance but requires fewer samples and training steps by leveraging the existence of task-specific models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2025.

Builds on

48 of 57 references.

References · 48

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  6. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  7. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  8. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  9. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  10. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  11. 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,789
  12. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,345
36 more
  1. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
  2. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,021
  3. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 816
  4. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 795
  5. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  6. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 679
  7. 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 631
  8. 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
  9. 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 613
  10. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
  11. 2018End-to-End Multi-Task Learning with Attentioncited by 533
  12. 2016Cross-stitch Networks for Multi-task Learningcited by 466
  13. 2021Conflict-Averse Gradient Descent for Multi-task Learningcited by 441
  14. 2022Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Modelscited by 384
  15. 2020Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 374
  16. 2019Which Tasks Should Be Learned Together in Multi-task Learning?cited by 367
  17. 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 328
  18. 2022MultiMAE: Multi-modal Multi-task Masked Autoencoderscited by 287
  19. 2023AdaMerging: Adaptive Model Merging for Multi-Task Learningcited by 248
  20. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 232
  21. 2021Efficiently Identifying Task Groupings for Multi-Task Learningcited by 218
  22. 2022Multi-Task Learning as a Bargaining Gamecited by 209
  23. 2020Just Pick a Sign: Optimizing Deep Multitask Models with Gradient Sign Dropoutcited by 199
  24. 2019Attentive Single-Tasking of Multiple Taskscited by 148
  25. 2020Linear Mode Connectivity in Multitask and Continual Learningcited by 144
  26. 2023Model Breadcrumbs: Scaling Multi-Task Model Merging with Sparse Maskscited by 130
  27. 2024Localizing Task Information for Improved Model Merging and Compressioncited by 130
  28. 2021Reasonable Effectiveness of Random Weighting: A Litmus Test for Multi-Task Learningcited by 100
  29. 2024Representation Surgery for Multi-Task Model Mergingcited by 95
  30. 2022Auto-Lambda: Disentangling Dynamic Task Relationshipscited by 73
  31. 2021Part-aware Panoptic Segmentationcited by 56
  32. 2024LiNeS: Post-training Layer Scaling Prevents Forgetting and Enhances Model Mergingcited by 39
  33. 2024Knowledge Composition using Task Vectors with Learned Anisotropic Scalingcited by 37
  34. 2023Merging by Matching Models in Task Parameter Subspacescited by 36
  35. 2022Pareto Manifold Learning: Tackling multiple tasks via ensembles of single-task modelscited by 29
  36. 2024Pareto Low-Rank Adapters: Efficient Multi-Task Learning with Preferencescited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.