mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Closed-Form Bounds for DP-SGD against Record-level Inference

arXiv 2402.14397 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2024cs.CR cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models trained with differentially-private (DP) algorithms such as DP-SGD enjoy resilience against a wide range of privacy attacks. Although it is possible to derive bounds for some attacks based solely on an (varepsilon,δ)-DP guarantee, meaningful bounds require a small enough privacy budget (i.e., injecting a large amount of noise), which results in a large loss in utility. This paper presents a new approach to evaluate the privacy of machine learning models against specific record-level threats, such as membership and attribute inference, without the indirection through DP. We focus on the popular DP-SGD algorithm, and derive simple closed-form bounds. Our proofs model DP-SGD as an information theoretic channel whose inputs are the secrets that an attacker wants to infer (e.g., membership of a data record) and whose outputs are the intermediate model parameters produced by iterative optimization. We obtain bounds for membership inference that match state-of-the-art techniques, whilst being orders of magnitude faster to compute. Additionally, we present a novel data-dependent bound against attribute inference. Our results provide a direct, interpretable, and practical way to evaluate the privacy of trained models against specific inference threats without sacrificing utility.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  4. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
  5. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
  6. 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
  7. 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 216
  8. 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 199
  9. 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
  10. 2022Connect the Dots: Tighter Discrete Approximations of Privacy Loss Distributionscited by 50
  11. 2020Tight Differential Privacy for Discrete-Valued Mechanisms and for the Subsampled Gaussian Mechanism Using FFTcited by 43
  12. 2022Bayesian Estimation of Differential Privacycited by 31
7 more
  1. 2020Investigating Membership Inference Attacks under Data Dependenciescited by 27
  2. 2021Computing Differential Privacy Guarantees for Heterogeneous Compositions Using FFTcited by 20
  3. 2022Optimal Membership Inference Bounds for Adaptive Composition of Sampled Gaussian Mechanismscited by 19
  4. 2017Bayes, not Na"ive: Security Bounds on Website Fingerprinting Defensescited by 5
  5. 2020Bayes Security: A Not So Average Metriccited by 5
  6. 2019F-BLEAU: Fast Black-box Leakage Estimationcited by 4
  7. 2022On the Importance of Architecture and Feature Selection in Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.