Closed-Form Bounds for DP-SGD against Record-level Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models trained with differentially-private (DP) algorithms such as DP-SGD enjoy resilience against a wide range of privacy attacks. Although it is possible to derive bounds for some attacks based solely on an (varepsilon,δ)-DP guarantee, meaningful bounds require a small enough privacy budget (i.e., injecting a large amount of noise), which results in a large loss in utility. This paper presents a new approach to evaluate the privacy of machine learning models against specific record-level threats, such as membership and attribute inference, without the indirection through DP. We focus on the popular DP-SGD algorithm, and derive simple closed-form bounds. Our proofs model DP-SGD as an information theoretic channel whose inputs are the secrets that an attacker wants to infer (e.g., membership of a data record) and whose outputs are the intermediate model parameters produced by iterative optimization. We obtain bounds for membership inference that match state-of-the-art techniques, whilst being orders of magnitude faster to compute. Additionally, we present a novel data-dependent bound against attribute inference. Our results provide a direct, interpretable, and practical way to evaluate the privacy of trained models against specific inference threats without sacrificing utility.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.
Builds on
19 of 35 references.
References · 19
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
- 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 216
- 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 199
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
- 2022Connect the Dots: Tighter Discrete Approximations of Privacy Loss Distributionscited by 50
- 2020Tight Differential Privacy for Discrete-Valued Mechanisms and for the Subsampled Gaussian Mechanism Using FFTcited by 43
- 2022Bayesian Estimation of Differential Privacycited by 31
7 more
- 2020Investigating Membership Inference Attacks under Data Dependenciescited by 27
- 2021Computing Differential Privacy Guarantees for Heterogeneous Compositions Using FFTcited by 20
- 2022Optimal Membership Inference Bounds for Adaptive Composition of Sampled Gaussian Mechanismscited by 19
- 2017Bayes, not Na"ive: Security Bounds on Website Fingerprinting Defensescited by 5
- 2020Bayes Security: A Not So Average Metriccited by 5
- 2019F-BLEAU: Fast Black-box Leakage Estimationcited by 4
- 2022On the Importance of Architecture and Feature Selection in Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025Synthetic Data Privacy Metricscited by 7
- 2024Attack-Aware Noise Calibration for Differential Privacycited by 6
- 2025Synthetic Data Privacy Metrics7 Jan 2025
- 2024Attack-Aware Noise Calibration for Differential Privacy2 Jul 2024