mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cost-Effective Proxy Reward Model Construction with On-Policy and Active Learning

arXiv 2407.02119 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF), as a widely adopted approach in current large language model pipelines, is textitbottlenecked by the size of human preference data. While traditional methods rely on offline preference dataset constructions, recent approaches have shifted towards online settings, where a learner uses a small amount of labeled seed data and a large pool of unlabeled prompts to iteratively construct new preference data through self-generated responses and high-quality reward/preference feedback. However, most current online algorithms still focus on preference labeling during policy model updating with given feedback oracles, which incurs significant expert query costs. textitWe are the first to explore cost-effective proxy reward oracles construction strategies for further labeling preferences or rewards with extremely limited labeled data and expert query budgets. Our approach introduces two key innovations: (1) on-policy query to avoid OOD and imbalance issues in seed data, and (2) active learning to select the most informative data for preference queries. Using these methods, we train a evaluation model with minimal expert-labeled data, which then effectively labels nine times more preference pairs for further RLHF training. For instance, our model using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) gains around over 1% average improvement on AlpacaEval2, MMLU-5shot and MMLU-0shot, with only 1.7K query cost. Our methodology is orthogonal to other direct expert query-based strategies and therefore might be integrated with them to further reduce query costs.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 26 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2024.

Builds on

26 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHF31 May
  2. 2024Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment1 May
  3. 2024REBEL: Reinforcement Learning via Regressing Relative Rewards25 Apr
  4. 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferences4 Apr
  5. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling20 Mar
  6. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Models18 Jan
  7. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint18 Dec
  8. 2023Confronting Reward Model Overoptimization with Constrained RLHF6 Oct
  9. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  10. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr

Other references · 16

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  6. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  7. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  8. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 712
  9. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
  10. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  11. 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 550
  12. 2021Batch Active Learning at Scalecited by 127
4 more
  1. 2023Some things are more CRINGE than others: Iterative Preference Optimization with the Pairwise Cringe Losscited by 108
  2. 2021Gone Fishing: Neural Active Learning with Fisher Embeddingscited by 88
  3. 2017Deep Active Learning over the Long Tailcited by 82
  4. 2024Bootstrapping Language Models with DPO Implicit Rewardscited by 53

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Towards Comprehensive Preference Data Collection for Reward Modeling
  2. 2024Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Active Queries
  3. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  4. 2023Benchmarks and Algorithms for Offline Preference-Based Reward Learning
  5. 2025PILAF: Optimal Human Preference Sampling for Reward Modeling
  6. 2026Data-dependent Exploration for Online Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
  7. 2023Sample Efficient Preference Alignment in LLMs via Active Exploration
  8. 2024How to Evaluate Reward Models for RLHF