Simple Augmentations of Logical Rules for Neuro-Symbolic Knowledge Graph Completion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-quality and high-coverage rule sets are imperative to the success of Neuro-Symbolic Knowledge Graph Completion (NS-KGC) models, because they form the basis of all symbolic inferences. Recent literature builds neural models for generating rule sets, however, preliminary experiments show that they struggle with maintaining high coverage. In this work, we suggest three simple augmentations to existing rule sets: (1) transforming rules to their abductive forms, (2) generating equivalent rules that use inverse forms of constituent relations and (3) random walks that propose new rules. Finally, we prune potentially low quality rules. Experiments over four datasets and five ruleset-baseline settings suggest that these simple augmentations consistently improve results, and obtain up to 7.1 pt MRR and 8.5 pt Hits@1 gains over using rules without augmentations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2024.
Builds on
9 of 25 references.
References · 9
- 2019RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Spacecited by 893
- 2017Convolutional 2D Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 729
- 2017DeepPath: A Reinforcement Learning Method for Knowledge Graph Reasoningcited by 265
- 2019DRUM: End-To-End Differentiable Rule Mining On Knowledge Graphscited by 173
- 2017Go for a Walk and Arrive at the Answer: Reasoning Over Paths in Knowledge Bases using Reinforcement Learningcited by 161
- 2020RNNLogic: Learning Logic Rules for Reasoning on Knowledge Graphscited by 117
- 2017Knowledge Graph Embedding with Iterative Guidance from Soft Rulescited by 51
- 2020Efficient Probabilistic Logic Reasoning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 50
- 2018Combining Axiom Injection and Knowledge Base Completion for Efficient Natural Language Inferencecited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.