Calibrated Large Language Models for Binary Question Answering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantifying the uncertainty of predictions made by large language models (LLMs) in binary text classification tasks remains a challenge. Calibration, in the context of LLMs, refers to the alignment between the model's predicted probabilities and the actual correctness of its predictions. A well-calibrated model should produce probabilities that accurately reflect the likelihood of its predictions being correct. We propose a novel approach that utilizes the inductive Venn--Abers predictor (IVAP) to calibrate the probabilities associated with the output tokens corresponding to the binary labels. Our experiments on the BoolQ dataset using the Llama 2 model demonstrate that IVAP consistently outperforms the commonly used temperature scaling method for various label token choices, achieving well-calibrated probabilities while maintaining high predictive quality. Our findings contribute to the understanding of calibration techniques for LLMs and provide a practical solution for obtaining reliable uncertainty estimates in binary question answering tasks, enhancing the interpretability and trustworthiness of LLM predictions.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2024.
Builds on
21 of 32 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
- 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 783
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 751
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
9 more
- 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 361
- 2013Learning by Transductioncited by 121
- 2023Do Language Models Know When They're Hallucinating References?cited by 116
- 2024API Is Enough: Conformal Prediction for Large Language Models Without Logit-Accesscited by 69
- 2023Conformal Nucleus Samplingcited by 33
- 2024Non-Exchangeable Conformal Language Generation with Nearest Neighborscited by 21
- 2015Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validitycited by 18
- 2023Evaluating Machine Translation Quality with Conformal Predictive Distributionscited by 9
- 2022Calibration of Natural Language Understanding Models with Venn--ABERS Predictorscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025AGENT-X: Adaptive Guideline-based Expert Network for Threshold-free AI-generated teXt detectioncited by 2
- 2026Identification and Honest Recovery from Semantic Observation Kernels: Operator Error, Coarsening, and Stabilitycited by 0
- 2026Aperture: Training-Free Multiscale Concept Bottlenecks for Remote Sensingcited by 0
- 2026Aperture: Training-Free Multiscale Concept Bottlenecks for Remote Sensing29 Sep 2026
- 2026Identification and Honest Recovery from Semantic Observation Kernels: Operator Error, Coarsening, and Stability25 Jul 2026
- 2025AGENT-X: Adaptive Guideline-based Expert Network for Threshold-free AI-generated teXt detection21 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023On the Calibration of Multilingual Question Answering LLMs
- 2026Uncertainty-Aware Abstention in Large Language Models with Provable Alignment Guarantees
- 2025Trained on Tokens, Calibrated on Concepts: The Emergence of Semantic Calibration in LLMs
- 2025Tools in the Loop: Quantifying Uncertainty of LLM Question Answering Systems That Use Tools
- 2026A Semantic-Sampling Framework for Evaluating Calibration in Open-Ended Question Answering
- 2026ConfidenceBench: Evaluating Confidence Calibration in Large Language Models
- 2025Revisiting Uncertainty Estimation and Calibration of Large Language Models
- 2025Mind the Confidence Gap: Overconfidence, Calibration, and Distractor Effects in Large Language Models