mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Preserving Multilingual Quality While Tuning Query Encoder on English Only

arXiv 2407.00923 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2024cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A query encoder of a dual passage retrieval system can be tuned for specific types of queries or domains, while the precomputed and stored documents representations are kept intact. Switching from one query encoder to another when needed is easily feasible, unlike overhauling the embeddings of a whole knowledge base. In this work we raise a question: Can the generic, original qualities of the encoder be preserved or at least left not too degraded when it is tuned on a narrow domain? We conducted experiments on a high quality multilingual embedding model: Tuning it on a single English-only dataset, we observe that the tuning not only preserves the multilingual qualities, but even improves them. The embedding qualities on distinctly different data are also improved or at least preserved. Drawing on our observations, we suggest a more general hypothesis: Tuning with intentionally low learning rate can preserve or improve a system's properties acquired in training, but not specifically targeted by tuning. We call this adiabatic tuning and provide tentative explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2024.

Builds on

24 of 36 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  3. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  4. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  5. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  6. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  7. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,216
  8. 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
  9. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
  10. 2018Universal Sentence Encodercited by 485
  11. 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 454
  12. 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 428
12 more
  1. 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 410
  2. 2017Train longer, generalize better: closing the generalization gap in large batch training of neural networkscited by 278
  3. 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
  4. 2021Efficiently Teaching an Effective Dense Retriever with Balanced Topic Aware Samplingcited by 238
  5. 2021RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-rankingcited by 175
  6. 2021Optimizing Dense Retrieval Model Training with Hard Negativescited by 154
  7. 2019Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learningcited by 143
  8. 2021PAIR: Leveraging Passage-Centric Similarity Relation for Improving Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 50
  9. 2020RepBERT: Contextualized Text Embeddings for First-Stage Retrievalcited by 46
  10. 2022English Contrastive Learning Can Learn Universal Cross-lingual Sentence Embeddingscited by 26
  11. 2023Empowering Dual-Encoder with Query Generator for Cross-Lingual Dense Retrievalcited by 5
  12. 2023Augmenting Passage Representations with Query Generation for Enhanced Cross-Lingual Dense Retrievalcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.