mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PopAlign: Population-Level Alignment for Fair Text-to-Image Generation

arXiv 2406.19668 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2024cs.CVcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-image (T2I) models achieve high-fidelity generation through extensive training on large datasets. However, these models may unintentionally pick up undesirable biases of their training data, such as over-representation of particular identities in gender or ethnicity neutral prompts. Existing alignment methods such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) fail to address this problem effectively because they operate on pairwise preferences consisting of individual samples, while the aforementioned biases can only be measured at a population level. For example, a single sample for the prompt "doctor" could be male or female, but a model generating predominantly male doctors even with repeated sampling reflects a gender bias. To address this limitation, we introduce PopAlign, a novel approach for population-level preference optimization, while standard optimization would prefer entire sets of samples over others. We further derive a stochastic lower bound that directly optimizes for individual samples from preferred populations over others for scalable training. Using human evaluation and standard image quality and bias metrics, we show that PopAlign significantly mitigates the bias of pretrained T2I models while largely preserving the generation quality. Code is available at https://github.com/jacklishufan/PopAlignSDXL.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 25 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2024.

Builds on

25 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Using Human Feedback to Fine-tune Diffusion Models without Any Reward Model22 Nov
  2. 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimization21 Nov

Other references · 23

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  6. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
  7. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  8. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  9. 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,717
  10. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
  11. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
  12. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
11 more
  1. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  2. 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 950
  3. 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 847
  4. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
  5. 2023Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Modelscited by 225
  6. 2023CADS: Unleashing the Diversity of Diffusion Models through Condition-Annealed Samplingcited by 124
  7. 2019Fair Generative Modeling via Weak Supervisioncited by 114
  8. 2022Refining Generative Process with Discriminator Guidance in Score-based Diffusion Modelscited by 98
  9. 2024ShieldLM: Empowering LLMs as Aligned, Customizable and Explainable Safety Detectorscited by 48
  10. 2020Improving the Fairness of Deep Generative Models without Retrainingcited by 46
  11. 2022Fair Generative Models via Transfer Learningcited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Aligned but Stereotypical? How System Prompts Shape Demographic Bias in LLM-Based Text-to-Image Models
  2. 2025CHATS: Combining Human-Aligned Optimization and Test-Time Sampling for Text-to-Image Generation
  3. 2025Free Lunch Alignment of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models without Preference Image Pairs
  4. 2024Embedding an Ethical Mind: Aligning Text-to-Image Synthesis via Lightweight Value Optimization
  5. 2025YINYANG-ALIGN: Benchmarking Contradictory Objectives and Proposing Multi-Objective Optimization based DPO for Text-to-Image Alignment
  6. 2023Aligning Text-to-Image Models using Human Feedback
  7. 2025InstructEngine: Instruction-driven Text-to-Image Alignment
  8. 2024Multimodal Large Language Model is a Human-Aligned Annotator for Text-to-Image Generation