mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AI Data Readiness Inspector (AIDRIN) for Quantitative Assessment of Data Readiness for AI

arXiv 2406.19256 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2024cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

"Garbage In Garbage Out" is a universally agreed quote by computer scientists from various domains, including Artificial Intelligence (AI). As data is the fuel for AI, models trained on low-quality, biased data are often ineffective. Computer scientists who use AI invest a considerable amount of time and effort in preparing the data for AI. However, there are no standard methods or frameworks for assessing the "readiness" of data for AI. To provide a quantifiable assessment of the readiness of data for AI processes, we define parameters of AI data readiness and introduce AIDRIN (AI Data Readiness Inspector). AIDRIN is a framework covering a broad range of readiness dimensions available in the literature that aid in evaluating the readiness of data quantitatively and qualitatively. AIDRIN uses metrics in traditional data quality assessment such as completeness, outliers, and duplicates for data evaluation. Furthermore, AIDRIN uses metrics specific to assess data for AI, such as feature importance, feature correlations, class imbalance, fairness, privacy, and FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) principle compliance. AIDRIN provides visualizations and reports to assist data scientists in further investigating the readiness of data. The AIDRIN framework enhances the efficiency of the machine learning pipeline to make informed decisions on data readiness for AI applications.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2024.

Builds on

13 of 48 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  4. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  5. 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 273
  6. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  7. 2022The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relativecited by 128
  8. 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
  9. 2021Data Quality Toolkit: Automatic assessment of data quality and remediation for machine learning datasetscited by 18
  10. 2023Improving Fairness in AI Models on Electronic Health Records: The Case for Federated Learning Methodscited by 17
  11. 2024Data Readiness for AI: A 360-Degree Surveycited by 15
  12. 2021SHAPr: An Efficient and Versatile Membership Privacy Risk Metric for Machine Learningcited by 10
1 more
  1. 2019The Explanation Game: Explaining Machine Learning Models Using Shapley Valuescited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

9 papers.