Online Stackelberg Optimization via Nonlinear Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In repeated interaction problems with adaptive agents, our objective often requires anticipating and optimizing over the space of possible agent responses. We show that many problems of this form can be cast as instances of online (nonlinear) control which satisfy textitlocal controllability, with convex losses over a bounded state space which encodes agent behavior, and we introduce a unified algorithmic framework for tractable regret minimization in such cases. When the instance dynamics are known but otherwise arbitrary, we obtain oracle-efficient O(√T) regret by reduction to online convex optimization, which can be made computationally efficient if dynamics are locally textitaction-linear. In the presence of adversarial disturbances to the state, we give tight bounds in terms of either the cumulative or per-round disturbance magnitude (for textitstrongly or textitweakly locally controllable dynamics, respectively). Additionally, we give sublinear regret results for the cases of unknown locally action-linear dynamics as well as for the bandit feedback setting. Finally, we demonstrate applications of our framework to well-studied problems including performative prediction, recommendations for adaptive agents, adaptive pricing of real-valued goods, and repeated gameplay against no-regret learners, directly yielding extensions beyond prior results in each case.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2024.
Builds on
32 of 59 references.
References · 32
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2020Performative Predictioncited by 318
- 2021Outside the Echo Chamber: Optimizing the Performative Riskcited by 95
- 2019Online Control with Adversarial Disturbancescited by 92
- 2020Stochastic Optimization for Performative Predictioncited by 92
- 2020Information Theoretic Regret Bounds for Online Nonlinear Controlcited by 87
- 2020Improper Learning for Non-Stochastic Controlcited by 83
- 2019Corruption-robust exploration in episodic reinforcement learningcited by 72
- 2018Online Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 55
- 2021Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?cited by 53
- 2019Strategizing against No-regret Learnerscited by 48
- 2017Selling to a No-Regret Buyercited by 43
20 more
- 2021Near-Optimal No-Regret Learning for Correlated Equilibria in Multi-Player General-Sum Gamescited by 43
- 2022Regret Minimization with Performative Feedbackcited by 40
- 2019Logarithmic Regret for Online Controlcited by 38
- 2020Adaptive Regret for Control of Time-Varying Dynamicscited by 38
- 2020Dynamic Incentive-aware Learning: Robust Pricing in Contextual Auctionscited by 34
- 2020Online learning in MDPs with linear function approximation and bandit feedbackcited by 29
- 2022Preference Dynamics Under Personalized Recommendationscited by 25
- 2015Learning in Auctions: Regret is Hard, Envy is Easycited by 23
- 2016Learning Simple Auctionscited by 23
- 2015Watch and Learn: Optimizing from Revealed Preferences Feedbackcited by 17
- 2021Polarization in Geometric Opinion Dynamicscited by 16
- 2023On the Convergence of No-Regret Learning Dynamics in Time-Varying Gamescited by 14
- 2022Diversified Recommendations for Agents with Adaptive Preferencescited by 9
- 2019A Geometric Model of Opinion Polarizationcited by 7
- 2019Online Learning for Measuring Incentive Compatibility in Ad Auctionscited by 5
- 2013Online Convex Optimization Against Adversaries with Memory and Application to Statistical Arbitragecited by 2
- 2014An online learning approach to dynamic pricing for demand responsecited by 2
- 2021Local controllability does imply global controllabilitycited by 2
- 2015No-Regret Learning in Bayesian Gamescited by 1
- 2019Robust Stackelberg buyers in repeated auctionscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.