mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Online Learning for Measuring Incentive Compatibility in Ad Auctions

arXiv 1901.06808 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2019cs.GT cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we investigate the problem of measuring end-to-end Incentive Compatibility (IC) regret given black-box access to an auction mechanism. Our goal is to 1) compute an estimate for IC regret in an auction, 2) provide a measure of certainty around the estimate of IC regret, and 3) minimize the time it takes to arrive at an accurate estimate. We consider two main problems, with different informational assumptions: In the advertiser problem the goal is to measure IC regret for some known valuation v, while in the more general demand-side platform (DSP) problem we wish to determine the worst-case IC regret over all possible valuations. The problems are naturally phrased in an online learning model and we design Regret-UCB algorithms for both problems. We give an online learning algorithm where for the advertiser problem the error of determining IC shrinks as OBig(frac|B|T·Big(fracln Tn + √fracln TnBig)Big) (where B is the finite set of bids, T is the number of time steps, and n is number of auctions per time step), and for the DSP problem it shrinks as OBig(frac|B|T·Big( frac|B|ln Tn + √frac|B|ln TnBig)Big). For the DSP problem, we also consider stronger IC regret estimation and extend our Regret-UCB algorithm to achieve better IC regret error. We validate the theoretical results using simulations with Generalized Second Price (GSP) auctions, which are known to not be incentive compatible and thus have strictly positive IC regret.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

5 papers.