mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Diversified Recommendations for Agents with Adaptive Preferences

arXiv 2210.07773 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2022cs.IR cs.GT cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When an Agent visits a platform recommending a menu of content to select from, their choice of item depends not only on fixed preferences, but also on their prior engagements with the platform. The Recommender's primary objective is typically to encourage content consumption which optimizes some reward, such as ad revenue, but they often also aim to ensure that a wide variety of content is consumed by the Agent over time. We formalize this problem as an adversarial bandit task. At each step, the Recommender presents a menu of k (out of n) items to the Agent, who selects one item in the menu according to their unknown preference model, which maps their history of past items to relative selection probabilities. The Recommender then observes the Agent's chosen item and receives bandit feedback of the item's reward. In addition to optimizing reward from selected items, the Recommender must also ensure that the total distribution of chosen items has sufficiently high entropy. We define a class of preference models which are locally learnable, i.e. behavior over the entire domain can be estimated by only observing behavior in a small region; this includes models representable by bounded-degree polynomials as well as functions with a sparse Fourier basis. For this class, we give an algorithm for the Recommender which obtains tildeO(T3/4) regret against all item distributions satisfying two conditions: they are sufficiently diversified, and they are instantaneously realizable at any history by some distribution over menus. We show that these conditions are closely connected: all sufficiently high-entropy distributions are instantaneously realizable at any item history. We also give a set of negative results justifying our assumptions, in the form of a runtime lower bound for non-local learning and linear regret lower bounds for alternate benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2022.

Builds on

22 of 33 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
  2. 2020Performative Predictioncited by 318
  3. 2017Strategic Classification from Revealed Preferencescited by 126
  4. 2017How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utilitycited by 116
  5. 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 100
  6. 2020Stochastic Optimization for Performative Predictioncited by 92
  7. 2020Feedback Loop and Bias Amplification in Recommender Systemscited by 89
  8. 2021Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?cited by 53
  9. 2019Strategizing against No-regret Learnerscited by 48
  10. 2017Selling to a No-Regret Buyercited by 43
  11. 2020Understanding Echo Chambers in E-commerce Recommender Systemscited by 40
  12. 2022Regret Minimization with Performative Feedbackcited by 40
10 more
  1. 2020Optimizing Long-term Social Welfare in Recommender Systems: A Constrained Matching Approachcited by 32
  2. 2015Learning in Auctions: Regret is Hard, Envy is Easycited by 23
  3. 2018Online learning over a finite action set with limited switchingcited by 21
  4. 2018Chasing Nested Convex Bodies Nearly Optimallycited by 21
  5. 2015Watch and Learn: Optimizing from Revealed Preferences Feedbackcited by 17
  6. 2017Deconvolving Feedback Loops in Recommender Systemscited by 17
  7. 2016A Robust Sparse Fourier Transform in the Continuous Settingcited by 5
  8. 2019Trust and Trustworthiness in Social Recommender Systemscited by 5
  9. 2021Sequential Choice Bandits with Feedback for Personalizing users' experiencecited by 2
  10. 2022Emergent Instabilities in Algorithmic Feedback Loopscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

9 papers.