mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fully Exploiting Every Real Sample: SuperPixel Sample Gradient Model Stealing

arXiv 2406.18540 ↗First posted 18 May 2024cs.CV cs.CRcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model stealing (MS) involves querying and observing the output of a machine learning model to steal its capabilities. The quality of queried data is crucial, yet obtaining a large amount of real data for MS is often challenging. Recent works have reduced reliance on real data by using generative models. However, when high-dimensional query data is required, these methods are impractical due to the high costs of querying and the risk of model collapse. In this work, we propose using sample gradients (SG) to enhance the utility of each real sample, as SG provides crucial guidance on the decision boundaries of the victim model. However, utilizing SG in the model stealing scenario faces two challenges: 1. Pixel-level gradient estimation requires extensive query volume and is susceptible to defenses. 2. The estimation of sample gradients has a significant variance. This paper proposes Superpixel Sample Gradient stealing (SPSG) for model stealing under the constraint of limited real samples. With the basic idea of imitating the victim model's low-variance patch-level gradients instead of pixel-level gradients, SPSG achieves efficient sample gradient estimation through two steps. First, we perform patch-wise perturbations on query images to estimate the average gradient in different regions of the image. Then, we filter the gradients through a threshold strategy to reduce variance. Exhaustive experiments demonstrate that, with the same number of real samples, SPSG achieves accuracy, agreements, and adversarial success rate significantly surpassing the current state-of-the-art MS methods. Codes are available at https://github.com/zyl123456aB/SPSG_attack.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2024.

Builds on

47 of 74 references.

References · 47

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  7. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  8. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  9. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  10. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  11. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  12. 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,619
35 more
  1. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  2. 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,059
  3. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  4. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  5. 2019Relational Knowledge Distillationcited by 873
  6. 2019Contrastive Representation Distillationcited by 734
  7. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  8. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  9. 2019A Comprehensive Overhaul of Feature Distillationcited by 341
  10. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
  11. 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
  12. 2016Adversarial Training Methods for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 280
  13. 2019FreeLB: Enhanced Adversarial Training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 261
  14. 2018Knowledge Transfer via Distillation of Activation Boundaries Formed by Hidden Neuronscited by 235
  15. 2022Knowledge Distillation from A Stronger Teachercited by 204
  16. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 181
  17. 2018PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 159
  18. 2020Axiom-based Grad-CAM: Towards Accurate Visualization and Explanation of CNNscited by 151
  19. 2020Data-Free Model Extractioncited by 121
  20. 2019Smooth Grad-CAM++: An Enhanced Inference Level Visualization Technique for Deep Convolutional Neural Network Modelscited by 118
  21. 2019Prediction Poisoning: Towards Defenses Against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 79
  22. 2020ALP-KD: Attention-Based Layer Projection for Knowledge Distillationcited by 65
  23. 2022Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in a Hard Label Settingcited by 57
  24. 2019Defending Against Model Stealing Attacks with Adaptive Misinformationcited by 55
  25. 2018Self-supervised Knowledge Distillation Using Singular Value Decompositioncited by 47
  26. 2021Defending against Model Stealing via Verifying Embedded External Featurescited by 44
  27. 2022Exploring Inter-Channel Correlation for Diversity-preserved KnowledgeDistillationcited by 44
  28. 2023Point, Segment and Count: A Generalized Framework for Object Countingcited by 39
  29. 2021Zero-Shot Knowledge Distillation from a Decision-Based Black-Box Modelcited by 37
  30. 2021Delving into Data: Effectively Substitute Training for Black-box Attackcited by 27
  31. 2020Black-Box Ripper: Copying black-box models using generative evolutionary algorithmscited by 26
  32. 2021Black-Box Dissector: Towards Erasing-based Hard-Label Model Stealing Attackcited by 25
  33. 2022How to Steer Your Adversary: Targeted and Efficient Model Stealing Defenses with Gradient Redirectioncited by 21
  34. 2023Dual Student Networks for Data-Free Model Stealingcited by 17
  35. 2022IDEAL: Query-Efficient Data-Free Learning from Black-box Modelscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Model-Guardian: Protecting against Data-Free Model Stealing Using Gradient Representations and Deceptive Predictions
  2. 2025Stealix: Model Stealing via Prompt Evolution
  3. 2023Towards Few-Call Model Stealing via Active Self-Paced Knowledge Distillation and Diffusion-Based Image Generation
  4. 2025PROMPTMINER: Black-Box Prompt Stealing against Text-to-Image Generative Models via Reinforcement Learning and Fuzz Optimization
  5. 2025Prompt Pirates Need a Map: Stealing Seeds helps Stealing Prompts
  6. 2024Community Forensics: Using Thousands of Generators to Train Fake Image Detectors
  7. 2026DiMEx: Breaking the Cold Start Barrier in Data-Free Model Extraction via Latent Diffusion Priors
  8. 2024Dual-Model Defense: Safeguarding Diffusion Models from Membership Inference Attacks through Disjoint Data Splitting