mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FactFinders at CheckThat! 2024: Refining Check-worthy Statement Detection with LLMs through Data Pruning

arXiv 2406.18297 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid dissemination of information through social media and the Internet has posed a significant challenge for fact-checking, among others in identifying check-worthy claims that fact-checkers should pay attention to, i.e. filtering claims needing fact-checking from a large pool of sentences. This challenge has stressed the need to focus on determining the priority of claims, specifically which claims are worth to be fact-checked. Despite advancements in this area in recent years, the application of large language models (LLMs), such as GPT, has only recently drawn attention in studies. However, many open-source LLMs remain underexplored. Therefore, this study investigates the application of eight prominent open-source LLMs with fine-tuning and prompt engineering to identify check-worthy statements from political transcriptions. Further, we propose a two-step data pruning approach to automatically identify high-quality training data instances for effective learning. The efficiency of our approach is demonstrated through evaluations on the English language dataset as part of the check-worthiness estimation task of CheckThat! 2024. Further, the experiments conducted with data pruning demonstrate that competitive performance can be achieved with only about 44% of the training data. Our team ranked first in the check-worthiness estimation task in the English language.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2024.

Builds on

12 of 21 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  5. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
  6. 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 535
  7. 2021A Survey on Automated Fact-Checkingcited by 378
  8. 2021Automated Fact-Checking: A Surveycited by 55
  9. 2018Overview of the CLEF-2018 CheckThat! Lab on Automatic Identification and Verification of Political Claims. Task 1: Check-Worthinesscited by 41
  10. 2024Claim Detection for Automated Fact-checking: A Survey on Monolingual, Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Researchcited by 35
  11. 2018Trends in the Diffusion of Misinformation on Social Mediacited by 25
  12. 2021Overview of the CLEF-2019 CheckThat!: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claimscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

6 papers.