AI Cards: Towards an Applied Framework for Machine-Readable AI and Risk Documentation Inspired by the EU AI Act
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the upcoming enforcement of the EU AI Act, documentation of high-risk AI systems and their risk management information will become a legal requirement playing a pivotal role in demonstration of compliance. Despite its importance, there is a lack of standards and guidelines to assist with drawing up AI and risk documentation aligned with the AI Act. This paper aims to address this gap by providing an in-depth analysis of the AI Act's provisions regarding technical documentation, wherein we particularly focus on AI risk management. On the basis of this analysis, we propose AI Cards as a novel holistic framework for representing a given intended use of an AI system by encompassing information regarding technical specifications, context of use, and risk management, both in human- and machine-readable formats. While the human-readable representation of AI Cards provides AI stakeholders with a transparent and comprehensible overview of the AI use case, its machine-readable specification leverages on state of the art Semantic Web technologies to embody the interoperability needed for exchanging documentation within the AI value chain. This brings the flexibility required for reflecting changes applied to the AI system and its context, provides the scalability needed to accommodate potential amendments to legal requirements, and enables development of automated tools to assist with legal compliance and conformity assessment tasks. To solidify the benefits, we provide an exemplar AI Card for an AI-based student proctoring system and further discuss its potential applications within and beyond the context of the AI Act.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2024.
Builds on
11 of 44 references.
References · 11
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
- 2021Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 82
- 2022Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners' Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and Desideratacited by 28
- 2022Risk management in the Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 16
- 2019The Transformative Potential of Artificial Intelligencecited by 15
- 2023Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Actcited by 14
- 2023Stronger Together: on the Articulation of Ethical Charters, Legal Tools, and Technical Documentation in MLcited by 9
- 2023Open Datasheets: Machine-readable Documentation for Open Datasets and Responsible AI Assessmentscited by 7
- 2024Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) -- Version 2cited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2025STREAM (ChemBio): A Standard for Transparently Reporting Evaluations in AI Model Reportscited by 9
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey and Classification of Evaluation Criteria for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligencecited by 3
- 2024Developing an Ontology for AI Act Fundamental Rights Impact Assessmentscited by 2
- 2025Underrepresentation, Label Bias, and Proxies: Towards Data Bias Profiles for the EU AI Act and Beyondcited by 2
- 2025TechOps: Technical Documentation Templates for the AI Actcited by 2
- 2025The AI Model Risk Catalog: What Developers and Researchers Miss About Real-World AI Harmscited by 2
- 2024AICat: An AI Cataloguing Approach to Support the EU AI Actcited by 0
- 2026RAD-AI: Rethinking Architecture Documentation for AI-Augmented Ecosystemscited by 0
- 2026Governance-as-Code: Translating EU AI Act Technical Requirements into Executable Compliance Pipelines for Generative AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026An Empirical Study and Assessment of EU AI Act Compliance Checkerscited by 0
- 2026An Empirical Study and Assessment of EU AI Act Compliance Checkers28 Sep 2026
- 2026Governance-as-Code: Translating EU AI Act Technical Requirements into Executable Compliance Pipelines for Generative AI Systems17 Sep 2026
- 2026RAD-AI: Rethinking Architecture Documentation for AI-Augmented Ecosystems30 Mar 2026
- 2025The AI Model Risk Catalog: What Developers and Researchers Miss About Real-World AI Harms21 Aug 2025
- 2025STREAM (ChemBio): A Standard for Transparently Reporting Evaluations in AI Model Reports13 Aug 2025
- 2025TechOps: Technical Documentation Templates for the AI Act12 Aug 2025
- 2025Underrepresentation, Label Bias, and Proxies: Towards Data Bias Profiles for the EU AI Act and Beyond9 Jul 2025
- 2024Developing an Ontology for AI Act Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments20 Dec 2024
- 2024AICat: An AI Cataloguing Approach to Support the EU AI Act19 Dec 2024
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey and Classification of Evaluation Criteria for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence10 Oct 2024