mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AI Cards: Towards an Applied Framework for Machine-Readable AI and Risk Documentation Inspired by the EU AI Act

arXiv 2406.18211 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2024cs.CY cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the upcoming enforcement of the EU AI Act, documentation of high-risk AI systems and their risk management information will become a legal requirement playing a pivotal role in demonstration of compliance. Despite its importance, there is a lack of standards and guidelines to assist with drawing up AI and risk documentation aligned with the AI Act. This paper aims to address this gap by providing an in-depth analysis of the AI Act's provisions regarding technical documentation, wherein we particularly focus on AI risk management. On the basis of this analysis, we propose AI Cards as a novel holistic framework for representing a given intended use of an AI system by encompassing information regarding technical specifications, context of use, and risk management, both in human- and machine-readable formats. While the human-readable representation of AI Cards provides AI stakeholders with a transparent and comprehensible overview of the AI use case, its machine-readable specification leverages on state of the art Semantic Web technologies to embody the interoperability needed for exchanging documentation within the AI value chain. This brings the flexibility required for reflecting changes applied to the AI system and its context, provides the scalability needed to accommodate potential amendments to legal requirements, and enables development of automated tools to assist with legal compliance and conformity assessment tasks. To solidify the benefits, we provide an exemplar AI Card for an AI-based student proctoring system and further discuss its potential applications within and beyond the context of the AI Act.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2024.

Builds on

11 of 44 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  2. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  3. 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
  4. 2021Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 82
  5. 2022Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners' Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and Desideratacited by 28
  6. 2022Risk management in the Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 16
  7. 2019The Transformative Potential of Artificial Intelligencecited by 15
  8. 2023Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Actcited by 14
  9. 2023Stronger Together: on the Articulation of Ethical Charters, Legal Tools, and Technical Documentation in MLcited by 9
  10. 2023Open Datasheets: Machine-readable Documentation for Open Datasets and Responsible AI Assessmentscited by 7
  11. 2024Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) -- Version 2cited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

10 papers.