mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating Noisy Supervision Using Synthetic Samples with Soft Labels

arXiv 2406.16966 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Noisy labels are ubiquitous in real-world datasets, especially in the large-scale ones derived from crowdsourcing and web searching. It is challenging to train deep neural networks with noisy datasets since the networks are prone to overfitting the noisy labels during training, resulting in poor generalization performance. During an early learning phase, deep neural networks have been observed to fit the clean samples before memorizing the mislabeled samples. In this paper, we dig deeper into the representation distributions in the early learning phase and find that, regardless of their noisy labels, learned representations of images from the same category still congregate together. Inspired by it, we propose a framework that trains the model with new synthetic samples to mitigate the impact of noisy labels. Specifically, we propose a mixing strategy to create the synthetic samples by aggregating original samples with their top-K nearest neighbours, wherein the weights are calculated using a mixture model learning from the per-sample loss distribution. To enhance the performance in the presence of extreme label noise, we estimate the soft targets by gradually correcting the noisy labels. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the estimated soft targets yield a more accurate approximation to ground truth labels and the proposed method produces a superior quality of learned representations with more separated and clearly bounded clusters. The extensive experiments in two benchmarks (CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100) and two larg-scale real-world datasets (Clothing1M and Webvision) demonstrate that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art methods and robustness of the learned representation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2024.

Builds on

39 of 52 references.

References · 39

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  4. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  5. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  6. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  7. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  8. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  9. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  10. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  11. 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 853
  12. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
27 more
  1. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  2. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  3. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  4. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  5. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  6. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  7. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  8. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
  9. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  10. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  11. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  12. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  13. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  14. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  15. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  16. 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
  17. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  18. 2019Gradient Descent with Early Stopping is Provably Robust to Label Noise for Overparameterized Neural Networkscited by 158
  19. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  20. 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
  21. 2019Combating Label Noise in Deep Learning Using Abstentioncited by 86
  22. 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
  23. 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
  24. 2019Robust Inference via Generative Classifiers for Handling Noisy Labelscited by 67
  25. 2020Coresets for Robust Training of Neural Networks against Noisy Labelscited by 24
  26. 2022SELC: Self-Ensemble Label Correction Improves Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 24
  27. 2021Confidence Adaptive Regularization for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.