mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks with Post-hoc Explanations for Multi-modal and Explainable Land Use Inference

arXiv 2406.13724 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2024cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Urban land use inference is a critically important task that aids in city planning and policy-making. Recently, the increased use of sensor and location technologies has facilitated the collection of multi-modal mobility data, offering valuable insights into daily activity patterns. Many studies have adopted advanced data-driven techniques to explore the potential of these multi-modal mobility data in land use inference. However, existing studies often process samples independently, ignoring the spatial correlations among neighbouring objects and heterogeneity among different services. Furthermore, the inherently low interpretability of complex deep learning methods poses a significant barrier in urban planning, where transparency and extrapolability are crucial for making long-term policy decisions. To overcome these challenges, we introduce an explainable framework for inferring land use that synergises heterogeneous graph neural networks (HGNs) with Explainable AI techniques, enhancing both accuracy and explainability. The empirical experiments demonstrate that the proposed HGNs significantly outperform baseline graph neural networks for all six land-use indicators, especially in terms of 'office' and 'sustenance'. As explanations, we consider feature attribution and counterfactual explanations. The analysis of feature attribution explanations shows that the symmetrical nature of the `residence' and 'work' categories predicted by the framework aligns well with the commuter's 'work' and 'recreation' activities in London. The analysis of the counterfactual explanations reveals that variations in node features and types are primarily responsible for the differences observed between the predicted land use distribution and the ideal mixed state. These analyses demonstrate that the proposed HGNs can suitably support urban stakeholders in their urban planning and policy-making.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2024.

Builds on

27 of 86 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  6. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  7. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,694
  8. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  9. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
  10. 2020Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 582
  11. 2020Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 384
  12. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 297
15 more
  1. 2021Ensemble deep learning: A reviewcited by 284
  2. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 233
  3. 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 167
  4. 2017The Shattered Gradients Problem: If resnets are the answer, then what is the question?cited by 157
  5. 2017Heterogeneous Information Network Embedding for Recommendationcited by 133
  6. 2020A Survey on Heterogeneous Graph Embedding: Methods, Techniques, Applications and Sourcescited by 126
  7. 2021NICE: An Algorithm for Nearest Instance Counterfactual Explanationscited by 62
  8. 2021Combining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifactscited by 38
  9. 2021MEG: Generating Molecular Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Graph Networkscited by 32
  10. 2022A Survey on Graph Counterfactual Explanations: Definitions, Methods, Evaluation, and Research Challengescited by 30
  11. 2024Robust Counterfactual Explanations in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 29
  12. 2021Further Generalizations of the Jaccard Indexcited by 26
  13. 2022GREASE: Generate Factual and Counterfactual Explanations for GNN-based Recommendationscited by 22
  14. 2022"There Is Not Enough Information": On the Effects of Explanations on Perceptions of Informational Fairness and Trustworthiness in Automated Decision-Makingcited by 19
  15. 2023AdapTraj: A Multi-Source Domain Generalization Framework for Multi-Agent Trajectory Predictioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.