mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to Generate Answers with Citations via Factual Consistency Models

arXiv 2406.13124 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently hallucinate, impeding their reliability in mission-critical situations. One approach to address this issue is to provide citations to relevant sources alongside generated content, enhancing the verifiability of generations. However, citing passages accurately in answers remains a substantial challenge. This paper proposes a weakly-supervised fine-tuning method leveraging factual consistency models (FCMs). Our approach alternates between generating texts with citations and supervised fine-tuning with FCM-filtered citation data. Focused learning is integrated into the objective, directing the fine-tuning process to emphasise the factual unit tokens, as measured by an FCM. Results on the ALCE few-shot citation benchmark with various instruction-tuned LLMs demonstrate superior performance compared to in-context learning, vanilla supervised fine-tuning, and state-of-the-art methods, with an average improvement of 34.1, 15.5, and 10.5 citation F1 points, respectively. Moreover, in a domain transfer setting we show that the obtained citation generation ability robustly transfers to unseen datasets. Notably, our citation improvements contribute to the lowest factual error rate across baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2024.

Builds on

37 of 59 references.

References · 37

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  5. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  6. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  7. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  8. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
  9. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
  10. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
  11. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
  12. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,203
25 more
  1. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
  2. 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 584
  3. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 578
  4. 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
  5. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
  6. 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 454
  7. 2020AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questionscited by 385
  8. 2023Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Enginescited by 297
  9. 2022RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Modelscited by 286
  10. 2023AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Functioncited by 284
  11. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  12. 2021Measuring Attribution in Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 253
  13. 2022ASQA: Factoid Questions Meet Long-Form Answerscited by 231
  14. 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 219
  15. 2021Hurdles to Progress in Long-form Question Answeringcited by 166
  16. 2023A Critical Evaluation of Evaluations for Long-form Question Answeringcited by 111
  17. 2023TrueTeacher: Learning Factual Consistency Evaluation with Large Language Modelscited by 82
  18. 2023HAGRID: A Human-LLM Collaborative Dataset for Generative Information-Seeking with Attributioncited by 55
  19. 2023Large Language Models Help Humans Verify Truthfulness -- Except When They Are Convincingly Wrongcited by 51
  20. 2021RAFT: A Real-World Few-Shot Text Classification Benchmarkcited by 44
  21. 2022mFACE: Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluationcited by 42
  22. 2022Falsesum: Generating Document-level NLI Examples for Recognizing Factual Inconsistency in Summarizationcited by 34
  23. 2024Learning to Plan and Generate Text with Citationscited by 28
  24. 2023Evaluating and Modeling Attribution for Cross-Lingual Question Answeringcited by 21
  25. 2023With a Little Push, NLI Models can Robustly and Efficiently Predict Faithfulnesscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 5.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026How Do LLMs Cite? A Mechanistic Interpretation of Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  2. 2024Towards Fine-Grained Citation Evaluation in Generated Text: A Comparative Analysis of Faithfulness Metrics
  3. 2024Citekit: A Modular Toolkit for Large Language Model Citation Generation
  4. 2026Parameters vs. Context: TRACE Fine-Tuning for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  5. 2024On the Capacity of Citation Generation by Large Language Models
  6. 2026Cited but Not Verified: Parsing and Evaluating Source Attribution in LLM Deep Research Agents
  7. 2025VeriCite: Towards Reliable Citations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Rigorous Verification
  8. 2025Transparentize the Internal and External Knowledge Utilization in LLMs with Trustworthy Citation