mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

QUILL: Quotation Generation Enhancement of Large Language Models

arXiv 2411.03675 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While Large language models (LLMs) have become excellent writing assistants, they still struggle with quotation generation. This is because they either hallucinate when providing factual quotations or fail to provide quotes that exceed human expectations. To bridge the gap, we systematically study how to evaluate and improve LLMs' performance in quotation generation tasks. We first establish a holistic and automatic evaluation system for quotation generation task, which consists of five criteria each with corresponding automatic metric. To improve the LLMs' quotation generation abilities, we construct a bilingual knowledge base that is broad in scope and rich in dimensions, containing up to 32,022 quotes. Moreover, guided by our critiria, we further design a quotation-specific metric to rerank the retrieved quotations from the knowledge base. Extensive experiments show that our metrics strongly correlate with human preferences. Existing LLMs struggle to generate desired quotes, but our quotation knowledge base and reranking metric help narrow this gap. Our dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/GraceXiaoo/QUILL.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2024.

Builds on

24 of 46 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  5. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  6. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  7. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  8. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
  9. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
  10. 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 645
  11. 2020Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Modelcited by 376
  12. 2023FacTool: Factuality Detection in Generative AI -- A Tool Augmented Framework for Multi-Task and Multi-Domain Scenarioscited by 251
12 more
  1. 2022Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generationcited by 165
  2. 2023Hallucinations in Large Multilingual Translation Modelscited by 129
  3. 2023Do Language Models Know When They're Hallucinating References?cited by 116
  4. 2020Controlled Hallucinations: Learning to Generate Faithfully from Noisy Datacited by 84
  5. 2022Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Bettercited by 75
  6. 2023PURR: Efficiently Editing Language Model Hallucinations by Denoising Language Model Corruptionscited by 53
  7. 2023mmT5: Modular Multilingual Pre-Training Solves Source Language Hallucinationscited by 24
  8. 2024Learning to Generate Answers with Citations via Factual Consistency Modelscited by 13
  9. 2022QuoteR: A Benchmark of Quote Recommendation for Writingcited by 10
  10. 2022Improved Beam Search for Hallucination Mitigation in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 10
  11. 2021Continuity of Topic, Interaction, and Query: Learning to Quote in Online Conversationscited by 8
  12. 2021Quotation Recommendation and Interpretation Based on Transformation from Queries to Quotationscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.