mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On-Policy Self-Alignment with Fine-grained Knowledge Feedback for Hallucination Mitigation

arXiv 2406.12221 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hallucination occurs when large language models exhibit behavior that deviates from the boundaries of their knowledge during response generation. To address this critical issue, previous learning-based methods attempt to finetune models but are limited by off-policy sampling and coarse-grained feedback. In this paper, we present textitbReinforcement bLearning bfor bHallucination (RLFH), an on-policy self-alignment approach that enables LLMs to actively explore their knowledge boundaries and self-correct generation behavior through fine-grained feedback signals. RLFH introduces a self-assessment framework where the policy serves as its own judge. Through this framework, responses are automatically decomposed into atomic facts and their truthfulness and informativeness are assessed against external knowledge sources. The resulting fine-grained feedback at the statement level are then converted into token-level dense reward signals. This enables online reinforcement learning to achieve precise and timely optimization without human intervention. Comprehensive evaluations on HotpotQA, SQuADv2, and Biography benchmarks validate RLFH's effectiveness in hallucination mitigation.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.

Builds on

33 of 58 references.

References · 33

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  6. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  7. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  9. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
  10. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
  11. 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelcited by 1,135
  12. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 783
21 more
  1. 2024Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AIcited by 719
  2. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 686
  3. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 401
  4. 2023How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowballcited by 311
  5. 2020ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Datasetcited by 268
  6. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 243
  7. 2022Quark: Controllable Text Generation with Reinforced Unlearningcited by 237
  8. 2023Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimizationcited by 231
  9. 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 221
  10. 2022Factuality Enhanced Language Models for Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 202
  11. 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hackingcited by 200
  12. 2024Understanding the performance gap between online and offline alignment algorithmscited by 110
  13. 2024Unfamiliar Finetuning Examples Control How Language Models Hallucinatecited by 87
  14. 2024Self-Alignment for Factuality: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Self-Evaluationcited by 80
  15. 2024Rejection Improves Reliability: Training LLMs to Refuse Unknown Questions Using RL from Knowledge Feedbackcited by 66
  16. 2024Learning to Trust Your Feelings: Leveraging Self-awareness in LLMs for Hallucination Mitigationcited by 44
  17. 2022Contrastive Learning Reduces Hallucination in Conversationscited by 40
  18. 2024Improving Large Language Models via Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning with Minimum Editing Constraintcited by 39
  19. 2020Revisiting Challenges in Data-to-Text Generation with Fact Groundingcited by 27
  20. 2023Domain-specific Continued Pretraining of Language Models for Capturing Long Context in Mental Healthcited by 25
  21. 2024Knowledge Verification to Nip Hallucination in the Budcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Thinking, Faithful and Stable: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs
  2. 2026KARL: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Knowledge-Boundary-Aware Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026Token-Guard: Towards Token-Level Hallucination Control via Self-Checking Decoding
  4. 2026MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination
  5. 2026DEEPO: Dual-Entropy Enhanced Policy Optimization for Hallucination in MLLMs
  6. 2026Reasoning Error from Known Fact: Step-Level Self-Consistency Group Relative Policy Optimization for LLM
  7. 2026HARPO: Hallucination-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Faithful and Creative Language Generation
  8. 2026Stick to What You Know: A Study of Knowledge-Aligned Supervised Fine-Tuning