SCAR: Data Selection via Style Consistency-Aware Response Ranking for Efficient Instruction-Tuning of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent studies emphasize that manually ensuring a consistent response style and maintaining high data quality in training sets can significantly improve the performance of fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) while reducing the number of training examples needed. However, the precise definition of style and the relationship between style, data quality, and LLM performance remains unclear. This research identifies two key stylistic elements in responses: linguistic form and instructional surprisal. We find that, among training data of comparable quality, higher consistency in these response elements leads to better LLM performance. Inspired by this, we introduce Style Consistency-Aware Response Ranking (SCAR), which automatically prioritizes instruction-response pairs in the training set based on their response stylistic consistency. By selecting the most style-consistent examples, using only 0.7% of the full dataset in the best case, the fine-tuned LLMs can match or even surpass the performance of models trained on the entire dataset in coding and open-ended question-answering benchmarks. Code and data are available at https://github.com/zhuang-li/SCAR .
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2024.
Builds on
52 of 87 references.
References · 52
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
38 more
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
- 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,139
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
- 2023StarCoder: may the source be with you!cited by 790
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
- 2023WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instructcited by 728
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
- 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 599
- 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
- 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 410
- 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 230
- 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 217
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
- 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 134
- 2023LaMini-LM: A Diverse Herd of Distilled Models from Large-Scale Instructionscited by 124
- 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 111
- 2024Self-Distillation Bridges Distribution Gap in Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 90
- 2019Diverse mini-batch Active Learningcited by 88
- 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
- 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
- 2021Machine Translationese: Effects of Algorithmic Bias on Linguistic Complexity in Machine Translationcited by 70
- 2023SeqXGPT: Sentence-Level AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 55
- 2023ICE-Score: Instructing Large Language Models to Evaluate Codecited by 50
- 2023LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection Toolcited by 44
- 2024Detecting AI-Generated Sentences in Human-AI Collaborative Hybrid Texts: Challenges, Strategies, and Insightscited by 21
- 2023Towards Automatic Boundary Detection for Human-AI Collaborative Hybrid Essay in Educationcited by 17
- 2023HANSEN: Human and AI Spoken Text Benchmark for Authorship Analysiscited by 10
- 2023Can Programming Languages Boost Each Other via Instruction Tuning?cited by 7
- 2023Temperature-scaling surprisal estimates improve fit to human reading times -- but does it do so for the "right reasons"?cited by 7
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2024Overview of the 2024 ALTA Shared Task: Detect Automatic AI-Generated Sentences for Human-AI Hybrid Articlescited by 2
- 2025RIDE: Enhancing Large Language Model Alignment through Restyled In-Context Learning Demonstration Exemplarscited by 2
- 2026Beyond Length Scaling: Synergizing Breadth and Depth for Generative Reward Modelscited by 1
- 2026Robust Reasoning via Dynamic Token Selection for Distribution-Aligned Self-Distillationcited by 1
- 2026CODEBLOCK: Learning to Supervise Code at the Right Granularitycited by 1
- 2026Mi:dm K 2.5 Procited by 0
- 2026CODEBLOCK: Learning to Supervise Code at the Right Granularity10 Jun 2026
- 2026Robust Reasoning via Dynamic Token Selection for Distribution-Aligned Self-Distillation30 May 2026
- 2026Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro19 Mar 2026
- 2026Beyond Length Scaling: Synergizing Breadth and Depth for Generative Reward Models2 Mar 2026
- 2025RIDE: Enhancing Large Language Model Alignment through Restyled In-Context Learning Demonstration Exemplars17 Feb 2025
- 2024Overview of the 2024 ALTA Shared Task: Detect Automatic AI-Generated Sentences for Human-AI Hybrid Articles19 Dec 2024