mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detecting AI-Generated Sentences in Human-AI Collaborative Hybrid Texts: Challenges, Strategies, and Insights

arXiv 2403.03506 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study explores the challenge of sentence-level AI-generated text detection within human-AI collaborative hybrid texts. Existing studies of AI-generated text detection for hybrid texts often rely on synthetic datasets. These typically involve hybrid texts with a limited number of boundaries. We contend that studies of detecting AI-generated content within hybrid texts should cover different types of hybrid texts generated in realistic settings to better inform real-world applications. Therefore, our study utilizes the CoAuthor dataset, which includes diverse, realistic hybrid texts generated through the collaboration between human writers and an intelligent writing system in multi-turn interactions. We adopt a two-step, segmentation-based pipeline: (i) detect segments within a given hybrid text where each segment contains sentences of consistent authorship, and (ii) classify the authorship of each identified segment. Our empirical findings highlight (1) detecting AI-generated sentences in hybrid texts is overall a challenging task because (1.1) human writers' selecting and even editing AI-generated sentences based on personal preferences adds difficulty in identifying the authorship of segments; (1.2) the frequent change of authorship between neighboring sentences within the hybrid text creates difficulties for segment detectors in identifying authorship-consistent segments; (1.3) the short length of text segments within hybrid texts provides limited stylistic cues for reliable authorship determination; (2) before embarking on the detection process, it is beneficial to assess the average length of segments within the hybrid text. This assessment aids in deciding whether (2.1) to employ a text segmentation-based strategy for hybrid texts with longer segments, or (2.2) to adopt a direct sentence-by-sentence classification strategy for those with shorter segments.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.

Builds on

28 of 42 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  4. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  5. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,219
  6. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  7. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
  8. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  9. 2021All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 287
  10. 2022CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilitiescited by 245
  11. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
  12. 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
16 more
  1. 2023OUTFOX: LLM-Generated Essay Detection Through In-Context Learning with Adversarially Generated Examplescited by 80
  2. 2018Text Segmentation as a Supervised Learning Taskcited by 76
  3. 2023Bad Actor, Good Advisor: Exploring the Role of Large Language Models in Fake News Detectioncited by 69
  4. 2022Real or Fake Text?: Investigating Human Ability to Detect Boundaries Between Human-Written and Machine-Generated Textcited by 63
  5. 2021The Impact of Multiple Parallel Phrase Suggestions on Email Input and Composition Behaviour of Native and Non-Native English Writerscited by 61
  6. 2023SeqXGPT: Sentence-Level AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 55
  7. 2020Text Segmentation by Cross Segment Attentioncited by 54
  8. 2020Two-Level Transformer and Auxiliary Coherence Modeling for Improved Text Segmentationcited by 41
  9. 2021Transformer over Pre-trained Transformer for Neural Text Segmentation with Enhanced Topic Coherencecited by 22
  10. 2020Improving Context Modeling in Neural Topic Segmentationcited by 21
  11. 2023Towards Automatic Boundary Detection for Human-AI Collaborative Hybrid Essay in Educationcited by 17
  12. 2023Improving Long Document Topic Segmentation Models With Enhanced Coherence Modelingcited by 15
  13. 2021Hierarchical Heterogeneous Graph Representation Learning for Short Text Classificationcited by 13
  14. 2022SynSciPass: detecting appropriate uses of scientific text generationcited by 10
  15. 2019Towards Understanding and Detecting Fake Reviews in App Storescited by 6
  16. 2021Human Guided Exploitation of Interpretable Attention Patterns in Summarization and Topic Segmentationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 8; 2026: 11.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2025DETree: DEtecting Human-AI Collaborative Texts via Tree-Structured Hierarchical Representation Learningcited by 12
  2. 2026GPTZero: Robust Detection of LLM-Generated Textscited by 10
  3. 2025AI use in American newspapers is widespread, uneven, and rarely disclosedcited by 9
  4. 2025Frankentext: Stitching random text fragments into long-form narrativescited by 8
  5. 2024SCAR: Data Selection via Style Consistency-Aware Response Ranking for Efficient Instruction-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 6
  6. 2025FAID: Fine-Grained AI-Generated Text Detection Using Multi-Task Auxiliary and Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 5
  7. 2025DAMASHA: Detecting AI in Mixed Adversarial Texts via Segmentation with Human-interpretable Attributioncited by 5
  8. 2026Segmenting Human-LLM Co-authored Text via Change Point Detectioncited by 5
  9. 2026'Your AI Text is not Mine': Redefining and Evaluating AI-generated Text Detection under Realistic Assumptionscited by 3
  10. 2025Better Call Claude: Can LLMs Detect Changes of Writing Style?cited by 1
  11. 2026Unveiling Spectral Mechanisms in Training-Free LLM Text Detectioncited by 1
  12. 2024Annotation Guidelines-Based Knowledge Augmentation: Towards Enhancing Large Language Models for Educational Text Classificationcited by 0
9 more
  1. 2025Large Language Models and Forensic Linguistics: Navigating Opportunities and Threats in the Age of Generative AIcited by 0
  2. 2025BAID: A Benchmark for Bias Assessment of AI Detectorscited by 0
  3. 2026Automatic detection of Gen-AI texts: A comparative framework of neural modelscited by 0
  4. 2026Hidden Human-Like Nature of Machine-Generated Texts: Theory and Detection Enhancementcited by 0
  5. 2026Detecting LLM-Generated Tokens in Human--LLM Coauthored Textcited by 0
  6. 2026Does AI Assistance Leave a Temporal Fingerprint? Detecting Overreliance in AI-Assisted Writing and Programmingcited by 0
  7. 2026C-HAT-Bench: Benchmarking Chinese AI-Text Detection Beyond Fully Generated Textcited by 0
  8. 2026LA-CPD: Local-Evidence-Aware Change-Point Detection for Human-LLM Authorship Segmentationcited by 0
  9. 2026Beyond Sub-Gaussian Detector Scores: Robust Weighted Profile-Loss Change Point Detection for Human-LLM Text Segmentationcited by 0