Assessing the Capability of LLMs in Solving POSCOMP Questions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly expanded the capabilities of artificial intelligence in natural language processing tasks. Despite this progress, their performance in specialized domains such as computer science remains relatively unexplored. Understanding the proficiency of LLMs in these domains is critical for evaluating their practical utility and guiding future developments. The POSCOMP, a prestigious Brazilian examination used for graduate admissions in computer science promoted by the Brazlian Computer Society (SBC), provides a challenging benchmark. This study investigates whether LLMs can match or surpass human performance on the POSCOMP exam. Four LLMs - ChatGPT-4, Gemini 1.0 Advanced, Claude 3 Sonnet, and Le Chat Mistral Large - were initially evaluated on the 2022 and 2023 POSCOMP exams. The assessments measured the models' proficiency in handling complex questions typical of the exam. LLM performance was notably better on text-based questions than on image interpretation tasks. In the 2022 exam, ChatGPT-4 led with 57 correct answers out of 69 questions, followed by Gemini 1.0 Advanced (49), Le Chat Mistral (48), and Claude 3 Sonnet (44). Similar trends were observed in the 2023 exam. ChatGPT-4 achieved the highest performance, surpassing all students who took the POSCOMP 2023 exam. LLMs, particularly ChatGPT-4, show promise in text-based tasks on the POSCOMP exam, although image interpretation remains a challenge. Given the rapid evolution of LLMs, we expanded our analysis to include more recent models - o1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, and o3-mini-high - evaluated on the 2022-2024 POSCOMP exams. These newer models demonstrate further improvements and consistently surpass both the average and top-performing human participants across all three years.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.
Builds on
12 of 32 references.
References · 12
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2023Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmarkcited by 186
- 2022GPT Takes the Bar Examcited by 65
- 2023GPT-3.5, GPT-4, or BARD? Evaluating LLMs Reasoning Ability in Zero-Shot Setting and Performance Boosting Through Promptscited by 34
- 2023Evaluating GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 Models on Brazilian University Admission Examscited by 25
- 2023GPT as Knowledge Worker: A Zero-Shot Evaluation of (AI)CPA Capabilitiescited by 22
- 2023ChatGPT in the Classroom: An Analysis of Its Strengths and Weaknesses for Solving Undergraduate Computer Science Questionscited by 13
- 2024Breaking the Language Barrier: Can Direct Inference Outperform Pre-Translation in Multilingual LLM Applications?cited by 12
- 2023Evaluating GPT-4's Vision Capabilities on Brazilian University Admission Examscited by 6
- 2024Evaluating ChatGPT-4 Vision on Brazil's National Undergraduate Computer Science Examcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.