Updating CLIP to Prefer Descriptions Over Captions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Although CLIPScore is a powerful generic metric that captures the similarity between a text and an image, it fails to distinguish between a caption that is meant to complement the information in an image and a description that is meant to replace an image entirely, e.g., for accessibility. We address this shortcoming by updating the CLIP model with the Concadia dataset to assign higher scores to descriptions than captions using parameter efficient fine-tuning and a loss objective derived from work on causal interpretability. This model correlates with the judgements of blind and low-vision people while preserving transfer capabilities and has interpretable structure that sheds light on the caption--description distinction.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2024.
Builds on
13 of 29 references.
References · 13
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
- 2023Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representationscited by 197
- 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 194
- 2022Causal Proxy Models for Concept-Based Model Explanationscited by 29
- 2021SMURF: SeMantic and linguistic UndeRstanding Fusion for Caption Evaluation via Typicality Analysiscited by 18
- 2022Context Matters for Image Descriptions for Accessibility: Challenges for Referenceless Evaluation Metricscited by 18
- 2021Concadia: Towards Image-Based Text Generation with a Purposecited by 15
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.