mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ContextRef: Evaluating Referenceless Metrics For Image Description Generation

arXiv 2309.11710 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2023cs.CL cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Referenceless metrics (e.g., CLIPScore) use pretrained vision--language models to assess image descriptions directly without costly ground-truth reference texts. Such methods can facilitate rapid progress, but only if they truly align with human preference judgments. In this paper, we introduce ContextRef, a benchmark for assessing referenceless metrics for such alignment. ContextRef has two components: human ratings along a variety of established quality dimensions, and ten diverse robustness checks designed to uncover fundamental weaknesses. A crucial aspect of ContextRef is that images and descriptions are presented in context, reflecting prior work showing that context is important for description quality. Using ContextRef, we assess a variety of pretrained models, scoring functions, and techniques for incorporating context. None of the methods is successful with ContextRef, but we show that careful fine-tuning yields substantial improvements. ContextRef remains a challenging benchmark though, in large part due to the challenge of context dependence.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2023.

Builds on

41 of 58 references.

References · 41

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  5. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  6. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  8. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  9. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  10. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  11. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
  12. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
29 more
  1. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
  2. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
  3. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  4. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 824
  5. 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 669
  6. 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 661
  7. 2023EVA-02: A Visual Representation for Neon Genesiscited by 381
  8. 2021WIT: Wikipedia-based Image Text Dataset for Multimodal Multilingual Machine Learningcited by 287
  9. 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 177
  10. 2013Zero-Shot Learning by Convex Combination of Semantic Embeddingscited by 135
  11. 2016Improved Image Captioning via Policy Gradient optimization of SPIDErcited by 113
  12. 2023VisText: A Benchmark for Semantically Rich Chart Captioningcited by 112
  13. 2022Learning to Break the Loop: Analyzing and Mitigating Repetitions for Neural Text Generationcited by 94
  14. 2018Learning to Evaluate Image Captioningcited by 53
  15. 2023Revisiting the Role of Language Priors in Vision-Language Modelscited by 50
  16. 2021Transparent Human Evaluation for Image Captioningcited by 40
  17. 2021UMIC: An Unreferenced Metric for Image Captioning via Contrastive Learningcited by 37
  18. 2016Automatic Description Generation from Images: A Survey of Models, Datasets, and Evaluation Measurescited by 36
  19. 2022Word Order Does Matter (And Shuffled Language Models Know It)cited by 32
  20. 2022Benchmarking Robustness of Multimodal Image-Text Models under Distribution Shiftcited by 24
  21. 2020Unsupervised Parsing via Constituency Testscited by 23
  22. 2022Context Matters for Image Descriptions for Accessibility: Challenges for Referenceless Evaluation Metricscited by 18
  23. 2020Pragmatic Issue-Sensitive Image Captioningcited by 15
  24. 2021Concadia: Towards Image-Based Text Generation with a Purposecited by 15
  25. 2021QACE: Asking Questions to Evaluate an Image Captioncited by 15
  26. 2022Automated Testing of Image Captioning Systemscited by 12
  27. 2023Dealing with Semantic Underspecification in Multimodal NLPcited by 9
  28. 2023PR-MCS: Perturbation Robust Metric for MultiLingual Image Captioningcited by 5
  29. 2017Room for improvement in automatic image description: an error analysiscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.