mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Context Matters for Image Descriptions for Accessibility: Challenges for Referenceless Evaluation Metrics

arXiv 2205.10646 ↗First posted 21 May 2022cs.CLcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Few images on the Web receive alt-text descriptions that would make them accessible to blind and low vision (BLV) users. Image-based NLG systems have progressed to the point where they can begin to address this persistent societal problem, but these systems will not be fully successful unless we evaluate them on metrics that guide their development correctly. Here, we argue against current referenceless metrics -- those that don't rely on human-generated ground-truth descriptions -- on the grounds that they do not align with the needs of BLV users. The fundamental shortcoming of these metrics is that they do not take context into account, whereas contextual information is highly valued by BLV users. To substantiate these claims, we present a study with BLV participants who rated descriptions along a variety of dimensions. An in-depth analysis reveals that the lack of context-awareness makes current referenceless metrics inadequate for advancing image accessibility. As a proof-of-concept, we provide a contextual version of the referenceless metric CLIPScore which begins to address the disconnect to the BLV data. An accessible HTML version of this paper is available at https://elisakreiss.github.io/contextual-description-evaluation/paper/reflessmetrics.html

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2022.

Builds on

17 of 44 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
  5. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  6. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  7. 2020Captioning Images Taken by People Who Are Blindcited by 108
  8. 2020Towards Question-Answering as an Automatic Metric for Evaluating the Content Quality of a Summarycited by 87
  9. 2020SUPERT: Towards New Frontiers in Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 69
  10. 2019Good News, Everyone! Context driven entity-aware captioning for news imagescited by 66
  11. 2021Transparent Human Evaluation for Image Captioningcited by 40
  12. 2021UMIC: An Unreferenced Metric for Image Captioning via Contrastive Learningcited by 37
5 more
  1. 2020On the Limitations of Cross-lingual Encoders as Exposed by Reference-Free Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 36
  2. 2021Bidimensional Leaderboards: Generate and Evaluate Language Hand in Handcited by 32
  3. 2021SMURF: SeMantic and linguistic UndeRstanding Fusion for Caption Evaluation via Typicality Analysiscited by 18
  4. 2021Concadia: Towards Image-Based Text Generation with a Purposecited by 15
  5. 2021QACE: Asking Questions to Evaluate an Image Captioncited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 7; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024WorldScribe: Towards Context-Aware Live Visual Descriptionscited by 26
  2. 2024Investigating Use Cases of AI-Powered Scene Description Applications for Blind and Low Vision Peoplecited by 24
  3. 2024Long-Form Answers to Visual Questions from Blind and Low Vision Peoplecited by 18
  4. 2023Dealing with Semantic Underspecification in Multimodal NLPcited by 9
  5. 2024Generating Contextually-Relevant Navigation Instructions for Blind and Low Vision Peoplecited by 7
  6. 2023Context-VQA: Towards Context-Aware and Purposeful Visual Question Answeringcited by 6
  7. 2024Toward Automatic Relevance Judgment using Vision--Language Models for Image--Text Retrieval Evaluationcited by 5
  8. 2023ContextRef: Evaluating Referenceless Metrics For Image Description Generationcited by 3
  9. 2023Grounded Intuition of GPT-Vision's Abilities with Scientific Imagescited by 3
  10. 2024Updating CLIP to Prefer Descriptions Over Captionscited by 3
  11. 2025Sightation Counts: Leveraging Sighted User Feedback in Building a BLV-aligned Dataset of Diagram Descriptionscited by 3
  12. 2023Alt-Text with Context: Improving Accessibility for Images on Twittercited by 2
6 more
  1. 2025Probing the Gaps in ChatGPT Live Video Chat for Real-World Assistance for People who are Blind or Visually Impairedcited by 2
  2. 2026When More Words Say Less: Decoupling Length and Specificity in Image Description Evaluationcited by 2
  3. 2025PoSh: Using Scene Graphs To Guide LLMs-as-a-Judge For Detailed Image Descriptionscited by 1
  4. 2024CommVQA: Situating Visual Question Answering in Communicative Contextscited by 0
  5. 2026When Backdoors Go Beyond Triggers: Semantic Drift in Diffusion Models Under Encoder Attackscited by 0
  6. 2026CANVAS: Captioning Art with Narrative Visual-Audio AI Systemscited by 0