mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Marginalization Consistent Probabilistic Forecasting of Irregular Time Series via Mixture of Separable flows

arXiv 2406.07246 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Probabilistic forecasting models for joint distributions of targets in irregular time series with missing values are a heavily under-researched area in machine learning, with, to the best of our knowledge, only two Models have been researched so far: The Gaussian Process Regression model, and ProFITi. While ProFITi, thanks to using multivariate normalizing flows, is very expressive, leading to better predictive performance, it suffers from marginalization inconsistency: It does not guarantee that the marginal distributions of a subset of variables in its predictive distributions coincide with the directly predicted distributions of these variables. When asked to directly predict marginal distributions, they are often vastly inaccurate. We propose MOSES (Marginalization Consistent Mixture of Separable Flows), a model that parametrizes a stochastic process through a mixture of several latent multivariate Gaussian Processes combined with separable univariate Normalizing Flows. In particular, MOSES can be analytically marginalized, allowing it to directly answer a wider range of probabilistic queries than most competitors. Experiments on four datasets show that MOSES achieves both accurate joint and marginal predictions, surpassing all other marginalization consistent baselines, while only trailing slightly behind ProFITi in joint prediction, but vastly superior when predicting marginal distributions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2024.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  3. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  4. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  5. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  6. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 680
  7. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
  8. 2016Recurrent Neural Networks for Multivariate Time Series with Missing Valuescited by 548
  9. 2019GRU-ODE-Bayes: Continuous modeling of sporadically-observed time seriescited by 230
  10. 2019Time2Vec: Learning a Vector Representation of Timecited by 208
  11. 2020Multivariate Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting via Conditioned Normalizing Flowscited by 142
  12. 2019Set Functions for Time Seriescited by 137
13 more
  1. 2019Graph Normalizing Flowscited by 103
  2. 2021Modeling Irregular Time Series with Continuous Recurrent Unitscited by 101
  3. 2021Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEscited by 99
  4. 2024ContiFormer: Continuous-Time Transformer for Irregular Time Series Modelingcited by 61
  5. 2020Invertible Generative Modeling using Linear Rational Splinescited by 39
  6. 2020Modeling Continuous Stochastic Processes with Dynamic Normalizing Flowscited by 37
  7. 2023Neural Continuous-Discrete State Space Models for Irregularly-Sampled Time Seriescited by 28
  8. 2020Scalable Normalizing Flows for Permutation Invariant Densitiescited by 22
  9. 2021Go with the Flows: Mixtures of Normalizing Flows for Point Cloud Generation and Reconstructioncited by 16
  10. 2020Variational Mixture of Normalizing Flowscited by 15
  11. 2021Non-Gaussian Gaussian Processes for Few-Shot Regressioncited by 12
  12. 2023Regions of Reliability in the Evaluation of Multivariate Probabilistic Forecastscited by 7
  13. 2022Tripletformer for Probabilistic Interpolation of Irregularly sampled Time Seriescited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.