mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Complexity-Aware Deep Symbolic Regression with Robust Risk-Seeking Policy Gradients

arXiv 2406.06751 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a novel deep symbolic regression approach to enhance the robustness and interpretability of data-driven mathematical expression discovery. Our work is aligned with the popular DSR framework which focuses on learning a data-specific expression generator, without relying on pretrained models or additional search or planning procedures. Despite the success of existing DSR methods, they are built on recurrent neural networks, solely guided by data fitness, and potentially meet tail barriers that can zero out the policy gradient, causing inefficient model updates. To overcome these limitations, we design a decoder-only architecture that performs attention in the frequency domain and introduce a dual-indexed position encoding to conduct layer-wise generation. Second, we propose a Bayesian information criterion (BIC)-based reward function that can automatically adjust the trade-off between expression complexity and data fitness, without the need for explicit manual tuning. Third, we develop a ranking-based weighted policy update method that eliminates the tail barriers and enhances training effectiveness. Extensive benchmarks and systematic experiments demonstrate the advantages of our approach. We have released our implementation at https://github.com/ZakBastiani/CADSR.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2024.

Builds on

23 of 59 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  5. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  6. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  7. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  8. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 209
  9. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 195
  10. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 185
  11. 2021SymbolicGPT: A Generative Transformer Model for Symbolic Regressioncited by 101
  12. 2019Integration of Neural Network-Based Symbolic Regression in Deep Learning for Scientific Discoverycited by 93
11 more
  1. 2019Bayesian Symbolic Regressioncited by 77
  2. 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 72
  3. 2022Symbolic Physics Learner: Discovering governing equations via Monte Carlo tree searchcited by 61
  4. 2022SymFormer: End-to-end symbolic regression using transformer-based architecturecited by 56
  5. 2023Deep symbolic regression for physics guided by units constraints: toward the automated discovery of physical lawscited by 55
  6. 2023Deep Generative Symbolic Regression with Monte-Carlo-Tree-Searchcited by 40
  7. 2023Deep Generative Symbolic Regressioncited by 27
  8. 2023A Neural-Guided Dynamic Symbolic Network for Exploring Mathematical Expressions from Datacited by 14
  9. 2022DCT-Former: Efficient Self-Attention with Discrete Cosine Transformcited by 12
  10. 2022Automated Learning of Interpretable Models with Quantified Uncertaintycited by 8
  11. 2024Vertical Symbolic Regression via Deep Policy Gradientcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.