mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Phase transition in large language models and the criticality of natural languages

arXiv 2406.05335 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2024cond-mat.dis-nn cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generation of text and speech in natural languages can be modeled as a stochastic process. This idea dates back to the seminal work of Markov and, later, to that of Shannon and also underlies the recent development of large language models (LLMs). The stochastic processes corresponding to natural languages should be distinct from those that generate nonlinguistic sequences. One of the features that discriminate linguistic and nonlinguistic sequences is power-law behavior, which is universally observed across different languages. In statistical physics, such behavior suggests that natural languages are critical: They lie near a phase transition point in a parametrized space of stochastic processes. However, testing this conjecture is not straightforward. A phase transition, even if it exists, cannot be directly observed in real-world natural languages because they do not have any controllable parameters. Here, we use LLMs as controllable effective models of natural languages. Through statistical analyses of texts generated by LLMs, we find that, when a parameter analogous to physical temperature is varied, LLMs undergo a phase transition. The transition separates a low-temperature phase with complex repetitive structures in generated texts from a high-temperature phase in which LLMs generate incomprehensible texts. At the critical point between these phases, generated texts display the power-law behavior similar to that of natural languages and most closely resemble natural languages as measured by a standard metric in natural language processing. These findings strongly suggest that natural languages are indeed critical.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2024.

Builds on

10 of 50 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  2. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  3. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  4. 2016Criticality in Formal Languages and Statistical Physicscited by 33
  5. 2024Release of Pre-Trained Models for the Japanese Languagecited by 22
  6. 2019Evaluating Computational Language Models with Scaling Properties of Natural Languagecited by 20
  7. 2017Do Neural Nets Learn Statistical Laws behind Natural Language?cited by 16
  8. 2019Mutual Information Scaling and Expressive Power of Sequence Modelscited by 14
  9. 2023Autocorrelations Decay in Texts and Applicability Limits of Language Modelscited by 7
  10. 2024Phase Transitions in the Output Distribution of Large Language Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

12 papers.