mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Computational Language Models with Scaling Properties of Natural Language

arXiv 1906.09379 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2019cs.CLcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this article, we evaluate computational models of natural language with respect to the universal statistical behaviors of natural language. Statistical mechanical analyses have revealed that natural language text is characterized by scaling properties, which quantify the global structure in the vocabulary population and the long memory of a text. We study whether five scaling properties (given by Zipf's law, Heaps' law, Ebeling's method, Taylor's law, and long-range correlation analysis) can serve for evaluation of computational models. Specifically, we test n-gram language models, a probabilistic context-free grammar (PCFG), language models based on Simon/Pitman-Yor processes, neural language models, and generative adversarial networks (GANs) for text generation. Our analysis reveals that language models based on recurrent neural networks (RNNs) with a gating mechanism (i.e., long short-term memory, LSTM; a gated recurrent unit, GRU; and quasi-recurrent neural networks, QRNNs) are the only computational models that can reproduce the long memory behavior of natural language. Furthermore, through comparison with recently proposed model-based evaluation methods, we find that the exponent of Taylor's law is a good indicator of model quality.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 8; 2026: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Language Model Evaluation Beyond Perplexitycited by 77
  2. 2022Evaluating Distributional Distortion in Neural Language Modelingcited by 18
  3. 2023Semantic Compression With Large Language Modelscited by 17
  4. 2024Phase transition in large language models and the criticality of natural languagescited by 12
  5. 2022Probing BERT's priors with serial reproduction chainscited by 11
  6. 2023CPopQA: Ranking Cultural Concept Popularity by LLMscited by 8
  7. 2024LLM-Generated Natural Language Meets Scaling Laws: New Explorations and Data Augmentation Methodscited by 8
  8. 2022A Natural Bias for Language Generation Modelscited by 6
  9. 2024Predict the Next Word: Humans exhibit uncertainty in this task and language models _____cited by 4
  10. 2025The Arabic AI Fingerprint: Stylometric Analysis and Detection of Large Language Models Textcited by 3
  11. 2025States of LLM-generated Texts and Phase Transitions between themcited by 2
  12. 2026Form and Meaning in Intrinsic Multilingual Evaluationscited by 2
8 more
  1. 2025SkewRoute: Training-Free LLM Routing for Knowledge Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Score Skewness of Retrieved Contextcited by 1
  2. 2025Correlation Dimension of Auto-Regressive Large Language Modelscited by 1
  3. 2023Strahler Number of Natural Language Sentences in Comparison with Random Treescited by 0
  4. 2025Rethinking the Relationship between the Power Law and Hierarchical Structurescited by 0
  5. 2025Overfitting has a limitation: a model-independent generalization gap bound based on R'enyi entropycited by 0
  6. 2025Scale-free Characteristics of Multilingual Legal Texts and the Limitations of LLMscited by 0
  7. 2025A Knowledge-Based Language Model: Deducing Grammatical Knowledge in a Multi-Agent Language Acquisition Simulationcited by 0
  8. 2026Escaping Mode Collapse in LLM Generation via Geometric Regulationcited by 0