mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Effective Data Selection for Seismic Interpretation through Disagreement

arXiv 2406.05149 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2024physics.geo-ph cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a discussion on data selection for deep learning in the field of seismic interpretation. In order to achieve a robust generalization to the target volume, it is crucial to identify the specific samples are the most informative to the training process. The selection of the training set from a target volume is a critical factor in determining the effectiveness of the deep learning algorithm for interpreting seismic volumes. This paper proposes the inclusion of interpretation disagreement as a valuable and intuitive factor in the process of selecting training sets. The development of a novel data selection framework is inspired by established practices in seismic interpretation. The framework we have developed utilizes representation shifts to effectively model interpretation disagreement within neural networks. Additionally, it incorporates the disagreement measure to enhance attention towards geologically interesting regions throughout the data selection workflow. By combining this approach with active learning, a well-known machine learning paradigm for data selection, we arrive at a comprehensive and innovative framework for training set selection in seismic interpretation. In addition, we offer a specific implementation of our proposed framework, which we have named ATLAS. This implementation serves as a means for data selection. In this study, we present the results of our comprehensive experiments, which clearly indicate that ATLAS consistently surpasses traditional active learning frameworks in the field of seismic interpretation. Our findings reveal that ATLAS achieves improvements of up to 12% in mean intersection-over-union.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2024.

Builds on

35 of 89 references.

References · 35

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  5. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  6. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  7. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  8. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  9. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  10. 2024Depth Anything: Unleashing the Power of Large-Scale Unlabeled Datacited by 1,346
  11. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  12. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
23 more
  1. 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 428
  2. 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
  3. 2024MM1: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Multimodal LLM Pre-trainingcited by 230
  4. 2019Discriminative Active Learningcited by 97
  5. 2019ViewAL: Active Learning with Viewpoint Entropy for Semantic Segmentationcited by 95
  6. 2017Deep Active Learning over the Long Tailcited by 82
  7. 2020Backpropagated Gradient Representations for Anomaly Detectioncited by 54
  8. 2021ReDAL: Region-based and Diversity-aware Active Learning for Point Cloud Semantic Segmentationcited by 52
  9. 2020DEAL: Difficulty-aware Active Learning for Semantic Segmentationcited by 32
  10. 2019A Machine Learning Benchmark for Facies Classificationcited by 27
  11. 2022Introspective Learning : A Two-Stage Approach for Inference in Neural Networkscited by 19
  12. 2022Volumetric Supervised Contrastive Learning for Seismic Semantic Segmentationcited by 12
  13. 2023Gaussian Switch Sampling: A Second Order Approach to Active Learningcited by 10
  14. 2019Semi-Supervised Segmentation of Salt Bodies in Seismic Images using an Ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 9
  15. 2019Structure Label Prediction Using Similarity-Based Retrieval and Weakly-Supervised Label Mappingcited by 9
  16. 2022Patient Aware Active Learning for Fine-Grained OCT Classificationcited by 9
  17. 2023Forgetful Active Learning with Switch Events: Efficient Sampling for Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 8
  18. 2022DECAL: DEployable Clinical Active Learningcited by 7
  19. 2022Man-recon: manifold learning for reconstruction with deep autoencoder for smart seismic interpretationcited by 7
  20. 2017Seismic facies recognition based on prestack data using deep convolutional autoencodercited by 5
  21. 2018Subsurface structure analysis using computational interpretation and learning: A visual signal processing perspectivecited by 5
  22. 2018The role of visual saliency in the automation of seismic interpretationcited by 5
  23. 2023Example Forgetting: A Novel Approach to Explain and Interpret Deep Neural Networks in Seismic Interpretationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.