Structure Label Prediction Using Similarity-Based Retrieval and Weakly-Supervised Label Mapping
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, there has been significant interest in various supervised machine learning techniques that can help reduce the time and effort consumed by manual interpretation workflows. However, most successful supervised machine learning algorithms require huge amounts of annotated training data. Obtaining these labels for large seismic volumes is a very time-consuming and laborious task. We address this problem by presenting a weakly-supervised approach for predicting the labels of various seismic structures. By having an interpreter select a very small number of exemplar images for every class of subsurface structures, we use a novel similarity-based retrieval technique to extract thousands of images that contain similar subsurface structures from the seismic volume. By assuming that similar images belong to the same class, we obtain thousands of image-level labels for these images; we validate this assumption in our results section. We then introduce a novel weakly-supervised algorithm for mapping these rough image-level labels into more accurate pixel-level labels that localize the different subsurface structures within the image. This approach dramatically simplifies the process of obtaining labeled data for training supervised machine learning algorithms on seismic interpretation tasks. Using our method we generate thousands of automatically-labeled images from the Netherlands Offshore F3 block with reasonably accurate pixel-level labels. We believe this work will allow for more advances in machine learning-enabled seismic interpretation.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022Introspective Learning : A Two-Stage Approach for Inference in Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2022Explanatory Paradigms in Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2023Clinically Labeled Contrastive Learning for OCT Biomarker Classificationcited by 9
- 2023Example Forgetting: A Novel Approach to Explain and Interpret Deep Neural Networks in Seismic Interpretationcited by 4
- 2025A Large-scale Benchmark on Geological Fault Delineation Models: Domain Shift, Training Dynamics, Generalizability, Evaluation and Inferential Behaviorcited by 4
- 2021Self-Supervised Delineation of Geological Structures using Orthogonal Latent Space Projectioncited by 2
- 2024CRACKS: Crowdsourcing Resources for Analysis and Categorization of Key Subsurface faultscited by 2
- 2022Explainable Machine Learning for Hydrocarbon Prospect Riskingcited by 1
- 2024Effective Data Selection for Seismic Interpretation through Disagreementcited by 0
- 2025A Large-scale Benchmark on Geological Fault Delineation Models: Domain Shift, Training Dynamics, Generalizability, Evaluation and Inferential Behavior13 May 2025
- 2024CRACKS: Crowdsourcing Resources for Analysis and Categorization of Key Subsurface faults20 Aug 2024
- 2024Effective Data Selection for Seismic Interpretation through Disagreement1 Jun 2024
- 2023Clinically Labeled Contrastive Learning for OCT Biomarker Classification24 May 2023
- 2023Example Forgetting: A Novel Approach to Explain and Interpret Deep Neural Networks in Seismic Interpretation24 Feb 2023
- 2022Explainable Machine Learning for Hydrocarbon Prospect Risking15 Dec 2022
- 2022Introspective Learning : A Two-Stage Approach for Inference in Neural Networks17 Sep 2022
- 2022Explanatory Paradigms in Neural Networks24 Feb 2022
- 2021Self-Supervised Delineation of Geological Structures using Orthogonal Latent Space Projection22 Aug 2021