Compositional Generalization with Grounded Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Grounded language models use external sources of information, such as knowledge graphs, to meet some of the general challenges associated with pre-training. By extending previous work on compositional generalization in semantic parsing, we allow for a controlled evaluation of the degree to which these models learn and generalize from patterns in knowledge graphs. We develop a procedure for generating natural language questions paired with knowledge graphs that targets different aspects of compositionality and further avoids grounding the language models in information already encoded implicitly in their weights. We evaluate existing methods for combining language models with knowledge graphs and find them to struggle with generalization to sequences of unseen lengths and to novel combinations of seen base components. While our experimental results provide some insight into the expressive power of these models, we hope our work and released datasets motivate future research on how to better combine language models with structured knowledge representations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2024.
Builds on
23 of 36 references.
References · 23
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
- 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 496
- 2021QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answeringcited by 386
- 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 280
- 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 264
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 260
- 2019KagNet: Knowledge-Aware Graph Networks for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 216
- 2020Beyond I.I.D.: Three Levels of Generalization for Question Answering on Knowledge Basescited by 169
- 2022Deep Bidirectional Language-Knowledge Graph Pretrainingcited by 156
- 2019Measuring Compositionality in Representation Learningcited by 84
- 2020JAKET: Joint Pre-training of Knowledge Graph and Language Understandingcited by 73
11 more
- 2019Grounded Conversation Generation as Guided Traverses in Commonsense Knowledge Graphscited by 59
- 2022TIARA: Multi-grained Retrieval for Robust Question Answering over Large Knowledge Basescited by 59
- 2021The paradox of the compositionality of natural language: a neural machine translation case studycited by 58
- 2018Improving Natural Language Inference Using External Knowledge in the Science Questions Domaincited by 48
- 2021JointLK: Joint Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Commonsense Question Answeringcited by 40
- 2022Can Transformer be Too Compositional? Analysing Idiom Processing in Neural Machine Translationcited by 28
- 2022On the Compositional Generalization Gap of In-Context Learningcited by 24
- 2021A Two-Stage Approach towards Generalization in Knowledge Base Question Answeringcited by 15
- 2022LM-CORE: Language Models with Contextually Relevant External Knowledgecited by 8
- 2022Compositional Generalisation with Structured Reordering and Fertility Layerscited by 6
- 2023Text-To-KG Alignment: Comparing Current Methods on Classification Taskscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.