mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HateDebias: On the Diversity and Variability of Hate Speech Debiasing

arXiv 2406.04876 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hate speech frequently appears on social media platforms and urgently needs to be effectively controlled. Alleviating the bias caused by hate speech can help resolve various ethical issues. Although existing research has constructed several datasets for hate speech detection, these datasets seldom consider the diversity and variability of bias, making them far from real-world scenarios. To fill this gap, we propose a benchmark HateDebias to analyze the fairness of models under dynamically evolving environments. Specifically, to meet the diversity of biases, we collect hate speech data with different types of biases from real-world scenarios. To further simulate the variability in the real-world scenarios(i.e., the changing of bias attributes in datasets), we construct a dataset to follow the continuous learning setting and evaluate the detection accuracy of models on the HateDebias, where performance degradation indicates a significant bias toward a specific attribute. To provide a potential direction, we further propose a continual debiasing framework tailored to dynamic bias in real-world scenarios, integrating memory replay and bias information regularization to ensure the fairness of the model. Experiment results on the HateDebias benchmark reveal that our methods achieve improved performance in mitigating dynamic biases in real-world scenarios, highlighting the practicality in real-world applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2024.

Builds on

49 of 68 references.

References · 49

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  5. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  6. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  7. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,219
  8. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
  9. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,094
  10. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  11. 2018Learning to Learn without Forgetting by Maximizing Transfer and Minimizing Interferencecited by 511
  12. 2016Adversarial Training Methods for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 280
37 more
  1. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
  2. 2020Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Modelscited by 222
  3. 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 208
  4. 2019Compacting, Picking and Growing for Unforgetting Continual Learningcited by 207
  5. 2021Semantic-aware Knowledge Distillation for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learningcited by 114
  6. 2021Debiasing Pre-trained Contextualised Embeddingscited by 107
  7. 2021Sustainable Modular Debiasing of Language Modelscited by 98
  8. 2022Linear Adversarial Concept Erasurecited by 98
  9. 2021Continual Learning for Text Classification with Information Disentanglement Based Regularizationcited by 86
  10. 2019Learning and Evaluating General Linguistic Intelligencecited by 78
  11. 2019Sentence Embedding Alignment for Lifelong Relation Extractioncited by 70
  12. 2020ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Datasetcited by 66
  13. 2021Essentials for Class Incremental Learningcited by 57
  14. 2021Subspace Regularizers for Few-Shot Class Incremental Learningcited by 54
  15. 2023Fairness-guided Few-shot Prompting for Large Language Modelscited by 53
  16. 2023Probing LLMs for hate speech detection: strengths and vulnerabilitiescited by 52
  17. 2021Layerwise Optimization by Gradient Decomposition for Continual Learningcited by 51
  18. 2021Diverse Adversaries for Mitigating Bias in Trainingcited by 48
  19. 2020Multilingual Twitter Corpus and Baselines for Evaluating Demographic Bias in Hate Speech Recognitioncited by 43
  20. 2021Class-Incremental Learning with Generative Classifierscited by 39
  21. 2020On Adversarial Bias and the Robustness of Fair Machine Learningcited by 36
  22. 2021Balancing out Bias: Achieving Fairness Through Balanced Trainingcited by 34
  23. 2021Contrastive Learning for Fair Representationscited by 34
  24. 2022Fairness Reprogrammingcited by 33
  25. 2022MABEL: Attenuating Gender Bias using Textual Entailment Datacited by 31
  26. 2022Fair Infinitesimal Jackknife: Mitigating the Influence of Biased Training Data Points Without Refittingcited by 26
  27. 2024From Languages to Geographies: Towards Evaluating Cultural Bias in Hate Speech Datasetscited by 23
  28. 2022Equi-Tuning: Group Equivariant Fine-Tuning of Pretrained Modelscited by 22
  29. 2021Domain-Incremental Continual Learning for Mitigating Bias in Facial Expression and Action Unit Recognitioncited by 19
  30. 2023CoSyn: Detecting Implicit Hate Speech in Online Conversations Using a Context Synergized Hyperbolic Networkcited by 12
  31. 2022Conditional Supervised Contrastive Learning for Fair Text Classificationcited by 11
  32. 2023Efficient Equivariant Transfer Learning from Pretrained Modelscited by 11
  33. 2022Representation Projection Invariance Mitigates Representation Collapsecited by 10
  34. 2024Are Models Biased on Text without Gender-related Language?cited by 10
  35. 2020Adversarial domain adaptation to reduce sample bias of a high energy physics classifiercited by 9
  36. 2023Towards Conceptualization of "Fair Explanation": Disparate Impacts of anti-Asian Hate Speech Explanations on Content Moderatorscited by 6
  37. 2023Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Task-Incremental Continual Learning with Adaptive Classification Criterioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.