Decision Boundary-aware Knowledge Consolidation Generates Better Instance-Incremental Learner
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Instance-incremental learning (IIL) focuses on learning continually with data of the same classes. Compared to class-incremental learning (CIL), the IIL is seldom explored because IIL suffers less from catastrophic forgetting (CF). However, besides retaining knowledge, in real-world deployment scenarios where the class space is always predefined, continual and cost-effective model promotion with the potential unavailability of previous data is a more essential demand. Therefore, we first define a new and more practical IIL setting as promoting the model's performance besides resisting CF with only new observations. Two issues have to be tackled in the new IIL setting: 1) the notorious catastrophic forgetting because of no access to old data, and 2) broadening the existing decision boundary to new observations because of concept drift. To tackle these problems, our key insight is to moderately broaden the decision boundary to fail cases while retain old boundary. Hence, we propose a novel decision boundary-aware distillation method with consolidating knowledge to teacher to ease the student learning new knowledge. We also establish the benchmarks on existing datasets Cifar-100 and ImageNet. Notably, extensive experiments demonstrate that the teacher model can be a better incremental learner than the student model, which overturns previous knowledge distillation-based methods treating student as the main role.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2024.
Builds on
23 of 35 references.
References · 23
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,094
- 2018End-to-End Incremental Learningcited by 596
- 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 561
- 2017CORe50: a New Dataset and Benchmark for Continuous Object Recognitioncited by 287
- 2018Re-evaluating Continual Learning Scenarios: A Categorization and Case for Strong Baselinescited by 228
- 2019Class-incremental Learning via Deep Model Consolidationcited by 172
- 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
- 2020Adaptive Aggregation Networks for Class-Incremental Learningcited by 149
11 more
- 2020Continual Prototype Evolution: Learning Online from Non-Stationary Data Streamscited by 143
- 2022Class-Incremental Learning by Knowledge Distillation with Adaptive Feature Consolidationcited by 113
- 2019Lifelong GAN: Continual Learning for Conditional Image Generationcited by 78
- 2020Incremental Learning In Online Scenariocited by 71
- 2022Class-Incremental Learning with Strong Pre-trained Modelscited by 60
- 2021Lifelong Person Re-Identification via Adaptive Knowledge Accumulationcited by 57
- 2023Online Prototype Learning for Online Continual Learningcited by 53
- 2022Exploring Example Influence in Continual Learningcited by 44
- 2019Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting by Neuron-level Plasticity Controlcited by 36
- 2022A simple but strong baseline for online continual learning: Repeated Augmented Rehearsalcited by 32
- 2022Incremental Task Learning with Incremental Rank Updatescited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.