mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rankability-enhanced Revenue Uplift Modeling Framework for Online Marketing

arXiv 2405.15301 ↗First posted 24 May 2024cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uplift modeling has been widely employed in online marketing by predicting the response difference between the treatment and control groups, so as to identify the sensitive individuals toward interventions like coupons or discounts. Compared with traditional textitconversion uplift modeling, textitrevenue uplift modeling exhibits higher potential due to its direct connection with the corporate income. However, previous works can hardly handle the continuous long-tail response distribution in revenue uplift modeling. Moreover, they have neglected to optimize the uplift ranking among different individuals, which is actually the core of uplift modeling. To address such issues, in this paper, we first utilize the zero-inflated lognormal (ZILN) loss to regress the responses and customize the corresponding modeling network, which can be adapted to different existing uplift models. Then, we study the ranking-related uplift modeling error from the theoretical perspective and propose two tighter error bounds as the additional loss terms to the conventional response regression loss. Finally, we directly model the uplift ranking error for the entire population with a listwise uplift ranking loss. The experiment results on offline public and industrial datasets validate the effectiveness of our method for revenue uplift modeling. Furthermore, we conduct large-scale experiments on a prominent online fintech marketing platform, Tencent FiT, which further demonstrates the superiority of our method in real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.

Builds on

6 of 39 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 478
  2. 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 287
  3. 2022Learning Causal Effects on Hypergraphscited by 31
  4. 2022Direct Heterogeneous Causal Learning for Resource Allocation Problems in Marketingcited by 21
  5. 2019Response Transformation and Profit Decomposition for Revenue Uplift Modelingcited by 15
  6. 2021Interpretable Multiple Treatment Revenue Uplift Modelingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 7.

12 papers.