mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Distilling Instruction-following Abilities of Large Language Models with Task-aware Curriculum Planning

arXiv 2405.13448 ↗First posted 22 May 2024cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning aims to align large language models (LLMs) with open-domain instructions and human-preferred responses. While several studies have explored autonomous approaches to distilling and annotating instructions from powerful proprietary LLMs, such as ChatGPT, they often neglect the impact of the distributions and characteristics of tasks, together with the varying difficulty of instructions in training sets. This oversight can lead to imbalanced knowledge capabilities and poor generalization powers of student LLMs. To address these challenges, we introduce Task-Aware Curriculum Planning for Instruction Refinement (TAPIR), a multi-round distillation framework that utilizes an oracle LLM to select instructions that are difficult for a student LLM to follow. To balance the student's capabilities, task distributions in training sets are adjusted with responses automatically refined according to their corresponding tasks. In addition, by incorporating curriculum planning, our approach systematically escalates the difficulty levels of tasks, progressively enhancing the student LLM's capabilities. We rigorously evaluate TAPIR using several widely recognized benchmarks (such as AlpacaEval 2.0, MT-Bench, etc.) and multiple student LLMs. Empirical results demonstrate that student LLMs, trained with our method and less training data, outperform larger instruction-tuned models and strong distillation baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.

Builds on

31 of 52 references.

References · 31

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  6. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  7. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  8. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  9. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  10. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  11. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,219
  12. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
19 more
  1. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  2. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  3. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
  4. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 710
  5. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
  6. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
  7. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
  8. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  9. 2023Large Language Models as Tool Makerscited by 293
  10. 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208
  11. 2023Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificitycited by 204
  12. 2023AugGPT: Leveraging ChatGPT for Text Data Augmentationcited by 128
  13. 2023Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendationcited by 113
  14. 2024Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuningcited by 57
  15. 2024SciInstruct: a Self-Reflective Instruction Annotated Dataset for Training Scientific Language Modelscited by 38
  16. 2023Large Language Models are Complex Table Parserscited by 28
  17. 2023Reflection-Tuning: Data Recycling Improves LLM Instruction-Tuningcited by 26
  18. 2023CITING: Large Language Models Create Curriculum for Instruction Tuningcited by 14
  19. 2023Dynamics of Instruction Fine-Tuning for Chinese Large Language Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 9; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: