SPOR: A Comprehensive and Practical Evaluation Method for Compositional Generalization in Data-to-Text Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Compositional generalization is an important ability of language models and has many different manifestations. For data-to-text generation, previous research on this ability is limited to a single manifestation called Systematicity and lacks consideration of large language models (LLMs), which cannot fully cover practical application scenarios. In this work, we propose SPOR, a comprehensive and practical evaluation method for compositional generalization in data-to-text generation. SPOR includes four aspects of manifestations (Systematicity, Productivity, Order invariance, and Rule learnability) and allows high-quality evaluation without additional manual annotations based on existing datasets. We demonstrate SPOR on two different datasets and evaluate some existing language models including LLMs. We find that the models are deficient in various aspects of the evaluation and need further improvement. Our work shows the necessity for comprehensive research on different manifestations of compositional generalization in data-to-text generation and provides a framework for evaluation.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2024.
Builds on
18 of 32 references.
References · 18
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
- 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 284
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 263
- 2017The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generationcited by 253
- 2017Challenges in Data-to-Document Generationcited by 226
- 2017Survey of the State of the Art in Natural Language Generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluationcited by 206
- 2019Handling Divergent Reference Texts when Evaluating Table-to-Text Generationcited by 119
6 more
- 2020Investigating Pretrained Language Models for Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 117
- 2020Text-to-Text Pre-Training for Data-to-Text Taskscited by 104
- 2021Making Transformers Solve Compositional Taskscited by 72
- 2019Semantic Noise Matters for Neural Natural Language Generationcited by 64
- 2018End-to-End Content and Plan Selection for Data-to-Text Generationcited by 20
- 2021Improving Compositional Generalization with Self-Training for Data-to-Text Generationcited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Can Large Language Models Always Solve Easy Problems if They Can Solve Harder Ones?cited by 9
- 2025Investigating the (De)Composition Capabilities of Large Language Models in Natural-to-Formal Language Conversioncited by 0
- 2026Investigating More Explainable and Partition-Free Compositionality Estimation for LLMs: A Rule-Generation Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026Investigating More Explainable and Partition-Free Compositionality Estimation for LLMs: A Rule-Generation Perspective30 Apr 2026
- 2025Investigating the (De)Composition Capabilities of Large Language Models in Natural-to-Formal Language Conversion24 Jan 2025
- 2024Can Large Language Models Always Solve Easy Problems if They Can Solve Harder Ones?18 Jun 2024