Investigating More Explainable and Partition-Free Compositionality Estimation for LLMs: A Rule-Generation Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Compositional generalization tests are often used to estimate the compositionality of LLMs. However, such tests have the following limitations: (1) they only focus on the output results without considering LLMs' understanding of sample compositionality, resulting in explainability defects; (2) they rely on dataset partition to form the test set with combinations unseen in the training set, suffering from combination leakage issues. In this work, we propose a novel rule-generation perspective for compositionality estimation for LLMs. It requires LLMs to generate a program as rules for dataset mapping and provides estimates of the compositionality of LLMs using complexity-based theory. The perspective addresses the limitations of compositional generalization tests and provides a new way to analyze the compositionality characterization of LLMs. We conduct experiments and analysis of existing advanced LLMs based on this perspective on a string-to-grid task, and find various compositionality characterizations and compositionality deficiencies exhibited by LLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.
Builds on
6 of 22 references.
References · 6
- 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 280
- 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 264
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 260
- 2024Understanding and Patching Compositional Reasoning in LLMscited by 45
- 2024A Complexity-Based Theory of Compositionalitycited by 13
- 2024SPOR: A Comprehensive and Practical Evaluation Method for Compositional Generalization in Data-to-Text Generationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.