Holistic Evaluation Metrics: Use Case Sensitive Evaluation Metrics for Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A large number of federated learning (FL) algorithms have been proposed for different applications and from varying perspectives. However, the evaluation of such approaches often relies on a single metric (e.g., accuracy). Such a practice fails to account for the unique demands and diverse requirements of different use cases. Thus, how to comprehensively evaluate an FL algorithm and determine the most suitable candidate for a designated use case remains an open question. To mitigate this research gap, we introduce the Holistic Evaluation Metrics (HEM) for FL in this work. Specifically, we collectively focus on three primary use cases, which are Internet of Things (IoT), smart devices, and institutions. The evaluation metric encompasses various aspects including accuracy, convergence, computational efficiency, fairness, and personalization. We then assign a respective importance vector for each use case, reflecting their distinct performance requirements and priorities. The HEM index is finally generated by integrating these metric components with their respective importance vectors. Through evaluating different FL algorithms in these three prevalent use cases, our experimental results demonstrate that HEM can effectively assess and identify the FL algorithms best suited to particular scenarios. We anticipate this work sheds light on the evaluation process for pragmatic FL algorithms in real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2024.
Builds on
23 of 45 references.
References · 23
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
- 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
- 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 572
- 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 562
- 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 463
- 2020Personalized Federated Learning: A Meta-Learning Approachcited by 312
- 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 204
- 2021Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare: A Surveycited by 184
- 2019FedHealth: A Federated Transfer Learning Framework for Wearable Healthcarecited by 182
11 more
- 2023Heterogeneous Federated Learning: State-of-the-art and Research Challengescited by 161
- 2020Federated Learning for Internet of Things: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Challengescited by 139
- 2019Federated Learning for Emoji Prediction in a Mobile Keyboardcited by 118
- 2017Natural Language Processing: State of The Art, Current Trends and Challengescited by 114
- 2021Multi-institutional Collaborations for Improving Deep Learning-based Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction Using Federated Learningcited by 78
- 2020Multi-Task Federated Learning for Personalised Deep Neural Networks in Edge Computingcited by 52
- 2021Federated Learning for Internet of Things: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 50
- 2021FedAdapt: Adaptive Offloading for IoT Devices in Federated Learningcited by 26
- 2021Applications of Federated Learning in Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Challengescited by 17
- 2020FedEval: A Holistic Evaluation Framework for Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2023FedHIL: Heterogeneity Resilient Federated Learning for Robust Indoor Localization with Mobile Devicescited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.