FedEval: A Holistic Evaluation Framework for Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) has been widely accepted as the solution for privacy-preserving machine learning without collecting raw data. While new technologies proposed in the past few years do evolve the FL area, unfortunately, the evaluation results presented in these works fall short in integrity and are hardly comparable because of the inconsistent evaluation metrics and experimental settings. In this paper, we propose a holistic evaluation framework for FL called FedEval, and present a benchmarking study on seven state-of-the-art FL algorithms. Specifically, we first introduce the core evaluation taxonomy model, called FedEval-Core, which covers four essential evaluation aspects for FL: Privacy, Robustness, Effectiveness, and Efficiency, with various well-defined metrics and experimental settings. Based on the FedEval-Core, we further develop an FL evaluation platform with standardized evaluation settings and easy-to-use interfaces. We then provide an in-depth benchmarking study between the seven well-known FL algorithms, including FedSGD, FedAvg, FedProx, FedOpt, FedSTC, SecAgg, and HEAgg. We comprehensively analyze the advantages and disadvantages of these algorithms and further identify the suitable practical scenarios for different algorithms, which is rarely done by prior work. Lastly, we excavate a set of take-away insights and future research directions, which are very helpful for researchers in the FL area.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2023Heterogeneous Federated Learning: State-of-the-art and Research Challengescited by 161
- 2023PFLlib: A Beginner-Friendly and Comprehensive Personalized Federated Learning Library and Benchmarkcited by 17
- 2023A Survey for Federated Learning Evaluations: Goals and Measurescited by 16
- 2024pfl-research: simulation framework for accelerating research in Private Federated Learningcited by 8
- 2023Federated Short-Term Load Forecasting with Personalization Layers for Heterogeneous Clientscited by 3
- 2024Holistic Evaluation Metrics: Use Case Sensitive Evaluation Metrics for Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2025PracMHBench: Re-evaluating Model-Heterogeneous Federated Learning Based on Practical Edge Device Constraintscited by 0
- 2026FLAM: Evaluating Model Performance with Aggregatable Measures in Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026Flower Hub: A Reproducible Benchmarking Platform for Federated Learning in Simulation and Deploymentcited by 0
- 2026Flower Hub: A Reproducible Benchmarking Platform for Federated Learning in Simulation and Deployment25 Aug 2026
- 2026FLAM: Evaluating Model Performance with Aggregatable Measures in Federated Learning8 May 2026
- 2025PracMHBench: Re-evaluating Model-Heterogeneous Federated Learning Based on Practical Edge Device Constraints4 Sep 2025
- 2024Holistic Evaluation Metrics: Use Case Sensitive Evaluation Metrics for Federated Learning3 May 2024
- 2024pfl-research: simulation framework for accelerating research in Private Federated Learning9 Apr 2024
- 2023PFLlib: A Beginner-Friendly and Comprehensive Personalized Federated Learning Library and Benchmark8 Dec 2023
- 2023Federated Short-Term Load Forecasting with Personalization Layers for Heterogeneous Clients22 Sep 2023
- 2023A Survey for Federated Learning Evaluations: Goals and Measures23 Aug 2023
- 2023Heterogeneous Federated Learning: State-of-the-art and Research Challenges20 Jul 2023